User talk:Dilic


 * You are blocked because your editing, specifically in relation to the distinction between Kosovo and Serbia, was disruptive in that your opinion, which you insisted on adding, was not the consensus view on wikipedia. Are you now prepared to accept the consensus view, even if you personally disagree with it? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 09:37, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

I am accept the consensus view, even I am personally disagree with it, and I hope that yuo will understand that Kosovo i Metohija is the part of the Serbia and always will be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilic (talk • contribs) 10:01, 21 December 2011‎


 * OK. Sorry if I appear to be pressing you, but your answers still concern me. Will you agree, without argument, on Kosovo-Serbia or any other related topics, not to post edits (except on talk-pages) against clear consensus? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:15, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * OK. I am already said “I will only put links to serbian wikipedia. Nothing else”


 * Hi. I'm not sure what you mean by "I will only put links to serbian wikipedia. Nothing else". Do you mean you will only add Interwiki links, like Србија for articles that also exist on the Serbian Wikipedia? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes!

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Gornjak Monastery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Tuman monastery
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tuman monastery, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.danube.travel/main-menu/find-what-to-do-on-the-danube/Tuman-Monastery.l-64.45.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tuman monastery


A tag has been placed on Tuman monastery requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.danube.travel/main-menu/find-what-to-do-on-the-danube/Tuman-Monastery.l-64.45.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 16:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!