User talk:Diomedea Exulans

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! &mdash; Rod talk 11:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Vortigern (thanks)
The IP is adding what is almost certainly original research - WP:OR - to Kent related articles and others (he just added a wiki link to 'Scandia', -- leaving it Scandia, check the link! Thanks. Dougweller (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Patent troll
Hi. Thanks for your edits to patent troll. The person who reverted your spelling "corrections" should really have explained why: topics on primarily US topics use US spelling and the Americans don't know the difference between practice and practise. Happy editing! GDallimore (Talk) 16:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)==

Changes to Banagher
Hi - you made some changes and additions to the Banagher article recently. The information that you provided on townlands, etc., doesn't belong in the introduction, in my opinion. Maybe some of it should be in History or Geography instead. Any new information should also be referenced. I put a huge amount of effort into getting Banagher a GA status (one of only a handful on Irish places that have it) so I keep an eye on it. It's great to see people adding to it, but the GA standards have to be maintained. Thanks.Corcs999 (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Got your message and have updated the article to incorporate the information that you wanted included. I agree that it should certainly be in there. I altered the Governance section to include "administrative units", which is what baronies are described as. I have also included parish and diocese information for RC and CoI, which should also be helpful for genealogy putposes. I have also promoted this section to the top. Have a look and see what you think.Corcs999 (talk) 00:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright Compadre
I feel your pain.

I have been through many copyright disputes with wikibullies (as I call them). I had one taken down that I took myself, of a sign that was state property, taken within rule of panorama, of which I had a message from the commonwealth attorney's office verifying lack of copyright status of the sign. It just sometimes comes down to small people with big powers, and an inability to back off when faced with rebuttals.

Remember don't sweat the the small stuff and remember it is all small.

I just thought of a solution for you. Create a flickr account, upload your pictures there with the free license compatible with wikipedia, then use the flickr import utility. I could have done that too. and will in the future. ~  К3вину  ( RSVP ) ( What ) 21:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Bail
Hello, I've reverted your deletion of content on Bail. I understand that it does not pertain to section UK, however the information should be rather moved elsewhere than being completely deleted. (If the rest of the article was sourced than I would not have a problem with this unsourced paragraph being deleted). Regards, Cimmerian praetor (talk) 20:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, seeing your description of the edit - I've answered you a couple of days ago on my talk page. I thought you've kept it in your watchlist. I thought it's customary to keep debate on one talk.Cimmerian praetor (talk) 08:06, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Beylical and other language
Hi Diomedea, I didn't notice the earlier reversion - sorry about that, I was just mildly irked by the 3 tags saying "in English" in a row, and tried to determine the translation of beylical. I've tried to address the issue as best I can here but I'm not actually familiar with the terms - so if you could take a quick look that might resolve the issue - or at least further comment may let someone else resolve it. Cheers EdwardLane (talk) 00:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Pegida
please check the talk page before removing material, as you did on PEGIDA, especially when theres a chance that it may be controversial.--Wuerzele (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Association of Business Psychologists


The article Association of Business Psychologists has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Cannot find any independent coverage of this organization. Does not appear to be notable."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Moriwen (talk) 21:40, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @Moriwen, please do not delete the page Association of Business Psychologists, it is a valuable organisation that has been undergoing some changes. I am on the Board and will be updating the Wiki page over the coming week or two with lots more information, including citations.  Please could you remove the plans to delete it?  Also, do you know how I can change the display title to Association for Business Psychology?  many thanks! BizPsychologist (talk) 13:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)