User talk:Doorzki

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LionMans Account (talk) 21:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Power~enwiki (talk) 05:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ·  投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe ·  Join WP Japan ! 05:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit-warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

On a second look at the evidence, I have increased the block to indefinite, due to the apparently entrenched and aggressive battleground mentality displayed by this account and the very strong suspicion of sockpuppetry. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:57, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see this. Then, please remove your unsubstantiated and disproven assertion that I am a sockpuppet. I only have one account and have only had one account. Doorzki (talk) 07:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Why did you remove the perma-block notice? Am I permanently blocked or not? Also, did you see this yet? You perma-blocked me for sockpuppetry and then the investigation proved that was wrong. Don't you think you should correct your mistake and your false conclusion? Doorzki (talk) 19:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Yes, you are permanently blocked, as I told you in my last posting here. And no, I won't unblock you, for three reasons: (1) there are enough grounds for a block even without sockpuppetry; (2) the SPI investigation didn't "prove I was wrong" by any means; there was merely an SPI clerk who uttered their personal opinion that they didn't find the evidence convincing; (3) I happen to disagree with that SPI clerk on that point. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:06, 7 August 2017 (UTC)