User talk:Dopplegangman

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 09:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)


 * You are a known user on Wikipedia with disruptive edits and a know sock puppet
 * get a job Dopplegangman (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
signed,Rosguill talk 16:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bhagavad Gita, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  19:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024
 You have been blocked from editing for two weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.
 * Personal attacks and harassment are not permitted on Wikipedia, and your combative behavior is way out of line. Cullen328 (talk) 20:14, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Dopplegangman (talk) 20:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * To be frank, your edit to Bhagavad Gita was not competent. Mistaking the age of the oldest surviving manuscript with the very different date of composition is a serious error, and competence is necessary to edit such topics. Cullen328 (talk) 20:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Seems like you don’t have the competence to have read my edit as I stated the oldest manuscript dates back then this would be evidence for it being made in the medieval era seems like you lack the competence to understand how these ideas overlap Dopplegangman (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * The date of the oldest surviving manuscript and the date of composition are two entirely unrelated matters. The fact that you seem not to understand this distinction is a serious problem. Cullen328 (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Based on the ongoing discussion at WP:ANI, your block is now indefinite. Cullen328 (talk) 02:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * And I wonder if talk page access should be revoked next considering he's accusing people of incompetence above for believing the fact that the Bhagavad Gita was not composed in medieval times. JM (talk) 02:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , I will make that decision about talk page access based on the editor's use of their talk page in the future, not in the past. You are free, of course, to ask another administrator to take a look. Dopplegangman, the purpose of your talk page access at this point is to discuss what you did wrong that led to this block, and to provide assurances that the misconduct will not happen again. If you harass or attack other editors again, I doubt that any administrator will be receptive to an unblock request. So speak carefully. Cullen328 (talk) 07:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I don’t say that it was 100% composed in medieval times but that is is could be a reason for it date along with other explainatiosns due to the fact of it oldest surviving manuscript
 * pleaer read and try to understand what I say before making a comment on it Dopplegangman (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

User:LevivichI noticed you said I should be permanently banned due to the fact I was attacking other wiki user like User:suthasianhistorian8i was merely showing this to prove he was disruptive I did not create this just showing it to prove disruptive edits Dopplegangman (talk) 09:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Unblock
Dopplegangman (talk) 09:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)  Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.