User talk:Drakonicon

Messages
Feel free to leave messages here about anything related or unrelated to Wikipedia.

Peace and Harmony,

D

Image copyright problem with Image:Edward_bach.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Edward_bach.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:16, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Ancientfuture.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ancientfuture.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BigDT 02:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Edgar Cayce edits
I am sorry for making such a dumb edit, actually i reverted few things, then i thought that the revert was not proper and added back a few things, and in the process screwed up the article, I will revert my mistakes, sorry. thanks a lot. --vineeth 10:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Metaphysics (New Age)
A tag has been placed on Metaphysics (New Age), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G6 housekeeping. The page was clearly created mistakenly and is intended to be a category. In any case Category:New Age is already nicely populated and this is not needed.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pascal.Tesson 05:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Category for the Jane Roberts article
Hi.

I need you to go to this page and vote whether the category for this article will be "Psychics", "Purported psychics", or "Psychics and/or purported psychics". Someone recently changed the name to "Purported psychics" and I'm trying to get it changed back to something less "skeptical".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_March_18#Category:Purported_psychics

Thanks!--Caleb Murdock 08:50, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Atlantis
The article Atlantis is undergoing a review as part of the good article sweeps project. You are listed as "actively involved with this article". The article does not seem to meet current requirements for a good article. It has been put on hold for a week; if these issues are addressed satisfactorily within that period the article will be kept as a GA, otherwise it will be delisted. Lampman (talk) 17:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nicholas Culpeper2.jpg


The file File:Nicholas Culpeper2.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

DS Alert

 * --Jorm (talk) 17:44, 21 January 2021 (UTC)