User talk:Ds1994

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Westminster Abbey Burials and Memorials, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

ok thanks.Ds1994 (talk) 19:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Duke of Edinburgh
Hi Ds1994. I want to alert you that I have made some further comments on Talk:Duke of Edinburgh. I do appreciate your interest, and the reference you supplied looks like a helpful one also. Best, --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 03:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Styling and Birth Dates
Hi, I have reviewing on the Royal Family articles, and Surtsicna (user) seems to be getting out of her way and consistently editing on styles and birth dates as to it should not be, since names are potentially announced on days of weeks after a birth of a royal, in which point it shouldn't be as this is retroactive. Styling is from date of birth onwards as is with the name, though announced on a later date as UK law states in can be done up to 42 days. It is just a pointless discussion, hope you can assist on trying to make this stop, thanks :) Pseud 14 (talk) 21:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Prince George_of_Cambridge#Title". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 04:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm Safiel. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Archie Mountbatten-Windsor that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''While we encourage users to register for accounts, calling a user out for being an IP editor in a talk thread could be considered a personal attack and is entirely unnecessary, please refrain from doing so in the future, thanks. I have NOT removed your comment as the template above indicates, just giving you a friendly notice.'' Safiel (talk) 20:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)