User talk:Ducky008

February 2022
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MrOllie (talk) 18:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * User:MrOllie, Sorry, I was unaware of the process. I'm glad there has been some thoughtful dialogue on the issue. Ducky008 (talk) 03:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

History of slavery
You really need to stop edit warring (or you'll be blocked--I'll do it myself if I have to), and you need to take this up on the talk page to see if you can get a consensus. Drmies (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * User:Drmies, Sorry, I was unaware of the process. Thanks for contributing to the dialogue. Ducky008 (talk) 03:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2024
Hi Ducky008! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at O. J. Simpson that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 09:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)