User talk:Dude00007

Fair use images
Please don't replace fair use images with larger version. Eeekster (talk) 01:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. Why use smaller versions of HQ images? Dude00007, Ph. D. (talk) 04:18, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Because they are protected by copyright and using smaller images is policy for fair use. Eeekster (talk) 04:34, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I see. Dude00007, Ph. D. (talk) 04:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Oil
Wow, that is a lot of oil for SineBot. I counted he had got 4 bottles - one 100px, a 270px, a massive 500px and a tiny bottle of 30px. Put on my talk page if you replied. Thanks!Dinosaur Fan (talk) 12:35, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Changes to wording at Garage rock article
Thank you for your interest in garage rock. I reverted your change not out of any disrespect, but rather out of respect for the consensus of editors already in place. A handful of editors have agreed upon the present wording. That does not mean we are closed to hearing your point of view. It would be best to start a thread on the talk page of the Garage rock article to propose the changes in wording you wish to make, and we will listen to your concerns. We appreciate your enthusiasm and willingness to contribute. Garagepunk66 (talk) 01:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Don't
...vandailze articles. Otherwise you'll be reported. --RivetHeadCulture (talk) 22:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Um, no. You are the one vandalizing articles, and if you keep it up, you will be the one who gets reported. Dude00007, Ph. D., Sc. D. (talk) 22:58, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Surely not, because these are reliable sources. It's violation against WP rules, if you remove reliable sources.
 * And btw: Why did you remove them? You removed them without a good reason. --RivetHeadCulture (talk) 09:41, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Hard rock, without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Post-punk. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Rob van  vee  12:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Dude00007/sandbox
User:Dude00007/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dude00007/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Dude00007/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notification - American Politics
power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 18:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.As you have given this warning to another editor, I assume you are aware of the rules, but I want to be perfectly clear: if you restore your images at Nazi symbolism or Identitarian movement without responding to the concerns on the talk page, I will consider it edit warring and will ask for you to be blocked, even if you have not violated any bright-line rules on reverts. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 22:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.