User talk:DurtyWilly


 * Feel free to edit here if you would like to personally comment on any edits, contributions, or new articles I've been involved in, or if you feel that something you are involved in would interest/affect me or my contributions, or if you just want to say "Hi."
 * Any attempted vandalism/flames/general disrespect will be rated on a 1-to-10 scale; 1 being the lowest possible score, 10 being the highest. Major criteria used for consideration will be: Creativity and Originality, Potential for Disruption, Actual Disruption, Artistic Merit, Technical Achievement, Spelling and Grammar, and Humorous Non Sequitur, weighted in respective order (Creativity and Originality being given the greatest weight, Spelling and Grammar the lowest. Non Sequitur is weighted unexpectedly). Judges' rulings are final.

Added on request of my son: I don't pee on bees. I am a strictly non-bee-peeer. (verbing "pee" actually does give it and extra "e" I swear to god.)

Thanks for your cvg contributions!
Hi! I saw your additions to Computer and video games and learned a new word, Haptic. Thanks for your contribution! P.S. I don't think you need to copy your contributions below for us visitors. We can just click on "User contributions" in the navigation bar "toolbox" on the left when visiting your pages. But if you would like to add a link you can use Special:Contributions/DurtyWilly :) -- Sitearm | Talk 03:34, 2005 August 26 (UTC)


 * Duh!...Thanks Sitearm, for pointing out the obvious to a cluless newbie (re: contributions). I've been using Wikipedia for a much longer time than I've been contributing, and I thirst for any help anyone is willing to give.Durty Willy 04:17, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Steel Reserve Article
Thank you! That is much, much, much better. Keep up the good work. I'm still uncertain about The Ramones stuff, but I think the article can be left at that until someone else comes up with something better, more accurate, or more verifiable. Again, thanks. The current article is vastly improved. TheMightyGrecian 21:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your question about BG&E
Hi there! I saw you needed info about the BG&E soundtrack and have provided the appropriate info. Hopefully you can find the full soundtrack, as it is most excellent :-) Here is the link to the article for your convenience: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Beyond_Good_%26_Evil_%28video_game%29#Soundtrack --Film11 17:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks! The info you had for the soundtrack was more than anyone's been able to give me, even UbiSoft! Durty Willy 16:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Beeramid
Hi

I removed the following paragraphs from Beeramid which you proceeded to add back in.

The reason I removed these paragraphs is that they are not factual. The fact that the word 'often' is used is a clear sign of a non-factual article. See WP:WEASEL for why 'often' should not be used in this way. how often in places frequented by drinkers? most frequently seen over 40 years? in short these two paragraphs are not encyclopedic and should be removed. (note I withdraw my comment about deletion). Rimmeraj 05:26, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Alternatively, can you rewrite to reflect fact not fiction.

Often found in places frequented by drinkers, a large beeramid was often a monument to the local party scene. Inspired by films such as National Lampoon's Animal House during the heyday of party culture, beeramids were most frequently seen during the late 1970s, the 1980s, and the early '90s, and could often be found in frat houses, dorms, and other collegiate locations throughout the US, as well as at so-called white trash dwellings and other places where canned beer was consumed in volume. Beeramids were rarely erected in commercial establishments, however, due to the potential impedance to service and possible liability of the owners.

Beeramids were often built as empty beer cans became available, slowly growing as the night (or week or month) wore on. In most cases, though, a beeramid was a temporary structure, eventually giving way to the inevitable clean-up or accidental destruction. The impermanence of the beeramid structure lends itself to easily removing the structure from wherever it has grown; combined with the great ease of creating a structure of relatively impressive size, beeramids remain popular today, especially when one considers it is often easier to contribute an empty beer can to the beeramid, than it is to deposit the can in the appropriate recycling receptacle.

Fact, not fiction:
I removed the offensive word, "often," from the article. WEASEL words aside, the phenomenon of Beeramids exist independently of Wikipedia, and the deletion of the majority of the article is not justified by the two inclusions of one word. True, the body of the article reflects personal observation by me and the other editors who have contributed up to this point. By all means, find additional citations if you're really serious (many exist), but find a better reason for deleting the majority of the body of the article. Durty Willy 06:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Post script: The article that got me hooked on Wikipedia has really evolved! I made this many years ago, anon, and while it's still kind of shaky, other contributors have kept improving it to no end. Photographs and outside articles keep being added and referenced. It's currently "beer pyramid," with "beeramid" as a disambiguation page. The Wikipedia concept can be the key for anyone learning about the culture they're entering. It's occasionally tainted by opinion and hoax, but never for long, and even then, the misinformation itself can provide insight. It's an amazing resource, and a great starting point for anyone who wants to know more about whatever it is they're researching. It has it's limitations, set forth ultimately by it's own contributors, but by giving citations, Wikipedia gives it's users straight facts immediately and the resources that provided those facts. I believe in Wikipedia. Durty Willy (talk) 06:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

CopyNight Orlando
Hi ! I see you're from Florida. If you're in the Orlando area, please check out this brief survey. I'm looking to start a meet-up of CopyNight, a monthly social discussion of copyright and related issues (like Wikipedia, Creative Commons, and open source). If that sounds neat, please answer this short survey to help with scheduling the event. Thanks! --Gavin Baker 10:42, 3 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Durty Willy 07:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Please see Tetraminoe's talk page for the full discussion.

Yes, this is solicitation,
aka spam. The spamming article Hu12 mentioned implicitly refers to "personal promotion or the promotion of...services..." as spam. I don't doubt your good intentions Tetraminoe, but this is not the way to implement them. I don't live anywhere near Orlando, and I have never mentioned Orlando on my user pages or discussions, and I've never talked to you before (I think), so it seems obvious (to me, anyway) that you're sending these messages indiscriminately to anyone who has the "Wikipedians in Florida" template. In fact, as of this writing, you've done nothing but make these "user:talk" edits: approx 150 since the 3rd. Thank you for not using a bot :) but even if you're doing it "by hand," it's still a type of unsolicited...um, solicitation. You've been here a long time, and I looked up some of your contribs (though not in my fields of interest, it's solid stuff!), I'd hate to see any of the more jumpy Wikipedians try to cause trouble for you. Durty Willy 06:00, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows
Hi DurtyWilly, I removed the spoiler tag you placed on this article. It's generally understood that a "Plot" section is going to reveal significant plot points, and therefore spoiler warnings are used only when they appear in a section where the reader would not reasonably expect to see a spoiler. I hope I explained this adequately. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. You may also want to read this guideline. Cheers, faithless   (speak)  01:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)


 * D'oh! Pardon, faithless. Funny, I made that same mistake for another article quite some time ago, you'd think I'd have remembered from the first time someone told me to read the dang WP:article instead of scanning for a template. Haven't been around lately, but it's no excuse for the lame (yet happily easily-fixed) mistake. Thanks for reminding me! Durty Willy 04:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. Welcome back! :) faithless   (speak)  04:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)