User talk:Dustimagic

DaGizza's RfA


Hi, thank you for supporting me in my RfA which passed with a tally of (93/1/2). If you need any help or wish discuss something with me, you are always welcome to talk to me. GizzaChat  &#169; 11:48, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations on your adminship.
I have received your message. I was busy so I could not reply until now. Best wish for your adminship.--Jusjih 08:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 18:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes yes, congrats indeed! Didn't realize til I got that friendly note about my AIV request :P  Congrats! -- light  darkness (talk) 13:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Congrats!!!--Kungfu Adam (talk) 23:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Re:Vandal
You admins are doing a great job. Thanks. Buchanan-H e  rmit™ .. CONTRIBS .. SPEAK!  19:23, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I second that; thank you! - CobaltBlueTony 19:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

snakes on a plane
I'm reverting your edit to Snakes on a Plane. You had changed Internet meme to Internet phenomenon. In fact there is a difference: Snakes on a plane is a meme, it's already developed derivatives (snakes on a blog, snakes on an elevator, snakes on <insert object here), which is the main characteristic of a meme. The internet phenomenon article, moreover, is broader and includes both memes and persons from the internet such as Tucker Max and Ellen Feiss. Meme is more appropriate. &rArr;   SWAT Jester     Ready    Aim    Fire!  03:09, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

DOH! I had no idea that Internet meme was merged with phenomenon. Self reverting back to your version! &rArr;   SWAT Jester     Ready    Aim    Fire!  03:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No worries. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 04:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the list of authorized users, and feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page if you have any questions. AmiDaniel (Talk) 00:21, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

?
Can you tell me what I did wrong on this page to be labeled vandalism? Aelfthrytha 04:00, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * New tool might have some bugs to work out in that case before it is fully implemented. Doesn't seem to meet the good faith assumption as is. Aelfthrytha 04:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

To Dustimagic
okay,dude, the changes in Emma Watson are factual. I read ALL the Harry Potter books and the first book IS called Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. Not "Philosopher's". Also,the thing about Peter Van "Pels",is true, too. I read the Diary of Anne Frank once and it said Peter Van Daan, not Peter Van "Pels". So that is not considered "vandalism". I do have to say sorry about the other recent things.*gulp* but the others were from facts!!!!! geez, u gotta understand THAT, at least!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.142.78.173 (talk • contribs) 11 April 2006 (UTC)


 * In reply on Dustimagic's behalf (forgive me if I'm presumptious), you've consistently ignored the invisible comments (visible during editing) that clearly state, "EDITORS: Please do not change "Philosopher's"—see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Describing_points_of_view#Nationalism". This means you've also ignored the passage within the article that states, "(released in the United States as Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone)"&mdash;in other words, it was "Sorceror's" only in the United States. Wikipedia does its best, per policy, to take a world view. Please respect that. Radio  Kirk   talk to me  04:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for backing me up regarding the Harry Potter issue. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 04:31, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * You're quite welcome. I'm very familiar with this issue; in fact, I'm the one who wrote the invis comment ref'd above ;) Radio  Kirk   talk to me  04:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, the thing about Peter is annoyin' me
that statement is TRUE already! In the book, it said that his name WAS Peter Van Daan. I think YOU mispelled it!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.142.78.173 (talk • contribs) 11 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Replied to talk page. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 04:32, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW everyone tells me after I've been nothing but an illusion! but thanks?

Harry Potter's Real Title
oh NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOW everyone tells me after I've been reading nothing but an illusion! but thanks?

Edit Summary
I was creating a new category on a users talk page. I assumed the edit summary would be returned as the name of that category. Thanks for the warning, but I make better summaries for my edits than most users. You'd know that if you went to my contributions page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jelligraze on average my summaries are at least a sentence or more long. --Jelligraze 04:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * It's just a friendly reminder nothing to take as a warning. I had been sending them to all the recent changes without summaries (most of them are chronic non-summarys). You do make more summaries than most. Thanks ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 18:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.1 is Now Available For Download
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:44, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

AJ Roach
Hey Dusti,

I see you speed deleted AJ Roach, and I gather that this was done without an AfD vote. I had nothing to do with that page, but as something of a fan of the guy's music I'm somewhat dissappointed. His music does not fit into any mass market genre, but it is not obvious to me that he does not meet WP:MUSIC criteria. Consider the following from WP:Music:
 * Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country, reported in notable and verifiable sources.
 * Roach has toured most of the US and Scottland in 2004-2005 playing small venues.tour, press.


 * Has been placed in rotation nationally by any major radio network.
 * Has been the subject of a half hour or hour broadcast on a national radio network.
 * In ~late 2004 Roach was featured as a live in studio guest on BBC2's Bob Harris Country. I have the exact date somewhere.  Harris was playing his music often at the time.  Seems their online playlists are not archived beyond a few weeks though.


 * Has won or placed in a major music competition.
 * For acoustic singer-songwriters winning first place in the general category of the Chris Austin Songwriting Competition at MerleFest is considered significant. 2004 winners.

Would it be a waste of time to ask for this deletion to be reviewed? -MrFizyx 03:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I have undeleted this article per a review of Mr. Roach. He is indeed notable enough to be included and does in fact meet WP:MUSIC by some of the standards expressed above. I apologize for this matter and thank you for alerting me. Some articles sent to speedy deletion are deleted by mistake as was this one. Sorry, ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 04:48, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Great, thanks for taking care of that! -MrFizyx 04:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof Problems?
I was just patrolling recent changes, and I noticed a few strange edits you've made, I believe with VandalProof. For instance you posted a VP-formatted warning on an anon's talk page after this revert. What seemed strange to me was that, on the revert, it simply left and edit summary of "Reverted edits by X to last version by Y" without "using VandalProof." And the warning you left was completely without any edit summary. Is this a bug in the software, have you managed to tweak it somewhow I didn't know was possible, or did you not use VP to do these reverts? I'm just curious to know. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I didn't tweak it. What's been happening, and I have notived this with other users as well I believe, is that when the VandalProof refert button is pressed the program acts like it reverts the changes but instead only posts a warning message. So what I've been doing is clicking the Revert button and quickly pressing my admin rollback button however sometimes the page loads to fast. Is there something I can do to avoid this problem? Thanks for noticing.  ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 05:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Aha, I know why. I just checked your monobook and you don't have popups installed. Unfortunately VP is currently still dependent upon popups (though I didn't know until about two days ago ... I thought autoclick and autosummary were built into WP), but later releases will be independent of it. In fact, my local version is almost free of popups, just a couple more hours and it'll be there. For now, you're just going to have to add to your monobook.js. Sorry about the inconvenience, but that should fix the problem. AmiDaniel (Talk) 05:25, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I was just reading this over and saw that might be the problem. Keep up the improvements and good work with the program I think its amazing despite my problems. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 05:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

you removed a link
hey i put up the myspace page link for mumia and you took it down. since dead prez had a myspace page link, i figured others could. maybe you thought Tahir was just some fan, but he is a political revolutionary rapper, and he regularly updates the 'Free Mumia' myspace page. here is a link to Tahir's Homecoming cd on amazon :

hope you put back the link, roweezy

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.252.11.139 (talk • contribs) 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Gangsta Rap
An individual completely deleted a large portion of the gangsta rap page, including several paragraphs about the different eras of the specific subgenre. Thus, I decided to change it back to its original state, but it's manifest that, perhaps, the changes were intended to be made and were not the product of an ostentatious user...

Double jepordy for 66.109.218.95
Hi Dustinmagic,

66.109.218.95, who has only done one vandalism, has got two warnings. Should one of the messages be removed? Otherwise, keep up the good work! Thanks, Andjam 02:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
 * I have removed the extra warning. I think we both posted our warnings around the same time. Thanks, ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C ) 02:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Love Sick Diaries
I'm sorry, but I wasn't testing anything Dustimagic. I apologize for the miscommunication, as I'm very excited about this new American Dogme Film. It will be featured in the upcoming film festivals around the world and states.

Thank you so much,

Michael Kumar Ahuja OLA Productions Tarzana, CA 91335

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.75.74.200 (talk • contribs) 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Old Skool Esperanzial note
Since this isn't the result of an AC meeting, I have decided to go Old Skool. This note is to remind you that the elections are taking place now and will end at 23:50 UTC on 2006-04-29. Please vote here. Thanks. --Cel es tianpower háblame 20:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Scouting article work
If you are getting this, it is because you do or did work on Scouting articles (see WikiProject_Scouting).

As the Scouting WikiProject has been formed since early January 2006, we've had many great improvements made in this area of Wiki and I want to personally thank everyone for their help. We don't always agree on things, but we keep moving forward. YIS, Rlevse 22:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Investigate/Block User
User:207.80.127.250 is a repeat vandal. All his recent edits are vandalism. He vandalized my userpage. Maybe you can take care of this issue. He's been blocked several times before. Thanks.

Chad --&gt; Eclectek 15:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

User:HarmilIs reverting articles like “Bob Sagget” unnecessary. I was putting names at the bottom, of the article about common names he was called and I said that the names were harassment. Yet he called it vandalism. Not only that he post any objections when I was going to repost it (Talk:Bob Saget). He is taking away freedom of speech. My claims are valid as he has been blocked before. Please help.

User:Wikipedialuva

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
 After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Importänt
Men har du en mamma eller vad menar du? Bävrar har svansar! Jag vet att trän barn inte föder jag hoppas du förstår läser inte. 217.209.101.245 04:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Philwiki
Hey, Dustimagic. I would like it of you could come to the next Philwiki weekly meeting. It's at 9PM Mountain time this Thursday. We do it on AIM to make it go quickly, so if you're interested, please convey your SN to me at some point. Please leave a message about how you want to get it to me on my Philwiki account. Thanks. Donbas 07:04, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

On Death Note
This is regards to my editing in Death Note.

I wish to clarify that I did not make any changes in Death Note. I simply fixed the arrangement of the First and Second Arcs so as to make the article more presentable to read.

Thanks

01:51, 10 June 2006 (UTC) 70.68.46.180 Ominae

A short Esperanzial update
As you may have gathered, discussions have been raging for about a week on the Esperanza talk page as to the future direction of Esperanza. Some of these are still ongoing and warrant more input (such as the idea to scrap the members list altogether). However, some decisions have been made and the charter has hence been amended. See what happened. Basically, the whole leadership has had a reshuffle, so please review the new, improved charter.

As a result, we are electing 4 people this month. They will replace JoanneB and Pschemp and form a new tranche A, serving until December. Elections will begin on 2006-07-02 and last until 2006-07-09. If you wish to run for a Council position, add your name to the list before 2006-07-02. For more details, see Esperanza/June 2006 elections.

Thanks and kind, Esperanzial regards, &mdash;Cel es tianpower háblame 16:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

JCP seal
Hey dustin, the JCP seal is being deleted. Check on that. I'm too lazy

Chad --&gt; Eclectek 05:53, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I took care of it Chad --&gt; Eclectek 15:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:K12Planet.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:K12Planet.gif, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. KWH 03:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Can you please contact me?
You posted a welcome on my user page when I first started using Wikipedia back in January. I've made a few edits in Wikipedia since then but my main activity has been creation of a wiki related to Jesuit identity. At this point, it should be viewed as a proof of concept. I tried to reach you by e-mail from your user page but I got a message saying e-mail is not set up or is disabled. You can e-mail me through my user page. Thanks. Workman 13:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:AddisonTollTunnel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AddisonTollTunnel.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 13:05, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Request for deleted page - Principles of system architecture
Pbacchi 07:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)(talk) a page was deleted and you mentioned in the deletion log you had a copy. Would it be possible for me to get a copy of the page that was Principles of system architecture. Thanks in advance.

Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 01:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me

Image tagging for Image:BenKweller.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BenKweller.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:53, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Your User Page
I reverted vandalism on it. ;) --Pupster21 Talk To Me 22:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Venturestrip.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Venturestrip.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:ArrowheadPatch.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:ArrowheadPatch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 11:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:DoubleH.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DoubleH.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:13, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:JesuitDallasMuseumLogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JesuitDallasMuseumLogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:TeenScreen.png
Thanks for uploading Image:TeenScreen.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:MADDlogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:MADDlogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Citing sources?
Hello,

My main contribution on Wiki is on Billings, Montana and not It seems that I have to have sources now. I really don't want to take the time and effort to research all the sources for everything I contribute. I know that Wiki doesn't want people to put untruthful information. I don't know what your position on this but some if not all of it comes from the residents who actually live there like myself and knows what goes on. All of my information I contribute at least is true or reasonable. I check the accuracy of contribs on the website and make any necessary changes or deletions.

Later,

Wolfdog1 07:19, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:SpaceDude.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:SpaceDude.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:BigTexanMotel.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BigTexanMotel.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 06:55, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Flight1248.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Flight1248.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Rebelguys2 talk 22:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

merge WikiProject Philmont Scout Ranch
As WikiProject Philmont Scout Ranch seems to have been inactive since the turn of the year, I propose making it a taskforce of WikiProject Scouting, similar to the WikiProject Scouting/Girl Guiding and Girl Scouting task force. That will ensure it won't get deleted (the WP:Council has been cleaning out inactive projects in recent months) and it will standardize that project with our existing MoS and membership base. We invite your suggestions and comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting. Chris 20:18, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * We have now gone ahead and moved this, it can now be found at WikiProject Scouting/Philmont Scout Ranch task force. Chris 07:31, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ranger Connection.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ranger Connection.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:32, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:HCTRA.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HCTRA.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~  Wi ki  her mit  01:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

RE: Deletion of Erik Eastaugh
I notice you voted against this being kept last time. I have renominated it. Currently the vote is in favour of delete anyway, but not enough people have voted, so if you could ask objective people to look this over and give their thoughts, this page can be decided on sooner rather than later.

Cheers, JJJ999 —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJJ999 (talk • contribs) 00:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mountian Creek Lake Bridge.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Mountian Creek Lake Bridge.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SetLoveFree.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:SetLoveFree.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:07, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Jesuit College Preparatory School of Dallas article
After reading your comment on my talk page and reviewing the situation (examining portions of the article's history, the reason given for the two deletions, etc.), I have found that the article's history was deleted improperly and that I overreacted to whatever content problems I thought I saw. The article does need extensive work and cleanup but that doesn't require deletion (except maybe for some of the earlier edits including text from here. Nonetheless, I found no reason for a "mass article-history purge".

As for the school's administration, I'm sorry they are upset but Wikipedia does not write for the benefit of outside entities. Much of the article still reads like an advertisement and still requires a lot of cleanup and removal of unencyclopedic content. I can assure you that I have nothing person against the school and have never even been to Texas. I hope this resolves the issues regarding this matter. Bumm13 (talk) 07:49, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

hi i am sorry snurgle x —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.135.58 (talk) 00:09, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

[Frankie goes to Hollywood] Artikel
Why do u do history no justice? Frankie Goes to Hollywood (FGTH) was a UK dance-pop band that was popular in the mid 1980s. The Liverpool group which became famous was fronted by Holly Johnson (vocals), supported by Paul Rutherford (vocals, keyboards), Peter Gill (drums, percussion), Mark O'Toole (bass guitar) and Brian Nash (guitar). At first, Frankie Goes To Hollywood was with Ambrose Reynolds, Steve Lovell and Phil Renshaw....this band demoed and rehearsed but never performed live. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.104.40.192 (talk) 10:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

hi
just saying your intro could be better i almost fell asleep reading it

samantha nicole pinder —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.254.35 (talk) 23:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dustimagic! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. βcommand 17:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:AATT.png
Thanks for uploading Image:AATT.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LewisvilleLakeTollBridge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LewisvilleLakeTollBridge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:BMHC.png
Thanks for uploading Image:BMHC.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --13:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SouthwestParkway.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:SouthwestParkway.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs (talk) 14:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rayado.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rayado.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Philbreak.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Philbreak.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

RD Reynolds AfD Vote
Hello, I thought you may be interested in this here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/R._D._Reynolds Spoke shook (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:08, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:06, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Administrators&oldid=526254016#Restoration_of_the_tools_.28proposal.29 recent change] to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Dallas North Tollway.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Dallas North Tollway.png

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 15:50, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Dallas North Tollway.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dallas North Tollway.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kinu t/c 21:16, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Building Materials Holding Corporation (logo).png
 Thanks for uploading File:Building Materials Holding Corporation (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:05, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:President George Bush Turnpike (emblem).png
 Thanks for uploading File:President George Bush Turnpike (emblem).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kanik.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Kanik.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Philmont Autumn Adventure.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Philmont Autumn Adventure.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TollTag.png
Thanks for uploading File:TollTag.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ★ Bigr   Tex  21:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

"Toll Tag" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Toll Tag. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aasim (talk) 00:07, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ute Gulch Camp (Philmont Scout Ranch).png
Thanks for uploading File:Ute Gulch Camp (Philmont Scout Ranch).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Black Mountain Camp (Philmont Scout Ranch).png
Thanks for uploading File:Black Mountain Camp (Philmont Scout Ranch).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Clark&#39;s Fork Camp (Philmont Scout Ranch).png
Thanks for uploading File:Clark&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Philmont Training Center for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philmont Training Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Philmont Training Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  spryde |  talk  19:44, 14 June 2024 (UTC)