User talk:Dustyveil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dustyveil, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Dustyveil! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your edits[edit]

Hello. I've reverted several of your edits because they were not improvements to articles. Please do not change 'Honours'/'References'/'External links' to 'Title'/'Reference'/'External link'. It's also unclear why you are removing the nationality of players from their introductions. Thanks, Number 57 12:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider this a final warning that if you make these changes again, you will be blocked. Number 57 13:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits are still incorrect or unhelpful. In edits like this you are removing 's' incorrectly from 'statistics', 'apps', 'goals' etc. There is also no good reason to remove the nationality. Any more edits like this and you will be blocked. Number 57 13:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57:, I'm not removing s or nationality. Allow me to edit other stuff. Dustyveil (talk) 13:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Based on the numerous errors you are introducing to articles in your edits, it does not appear that you have the competence to edit correctly. Number 57 13:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57:, I've stopped making those errors you said, the rest edits are unrelated. Dustyveil (talk) 13:37, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I asked you repeatedly to stop before you were blocked and you didn't. I have no reason to believe you will stop making these edits. Number 57 13:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: It's in a fast pace and I didn't notice, your warning was amidst the edit conflict, I'm about to stop after the second time you tell me to stop but you're just too quick to block me. Well, it doesn't matter as I have stopped now. I want to make other unrelated contributions. Also, I was intend to discuss with you on some of those edits you don't agree. Dustyveil (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:19, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for for continuing to make disruptive edits after being repeatedly warned not to. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Number 57 13:32, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you've continued making changes with grammatical errors (e.g. International goals → International goal, Honours → Title, you're blocked. This is either disruption or lack of competence. Number 57 13:32, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57:, I'm not removing s or nationality again, allow me make edits that is not controversial please. Dustyveil (talk) 13:34, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57:, can you stop blocking me, please? As I said, I'm not removing s or nationality anymore. I'm not doing that again without talk just to be blocked. I will only continue with the basic edits that are not controversial, mainly related to sentencing and structuring. Whereas for the edits that are not agreed upon, they will be discussed. Dustyveil (talk) 14:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As you don't seem to know when a plural is required, I don't see how you would be able to correctly amend sentences. I am not going to unblock you, but by all means request an unblock using the guidance above and see if someone else will consider it. Number 57 14:21, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57:, I've read guildline for usage of plurals on Wikipedia:Manual of Style page as a guide asked me to but I have seen nothing that said about its usage for articles' sections' titles. I remember reading many articles where its sections' headers don't use s for the nouns in the headers even if they can. This is a type of edit anyone can make. Can you be more open minded? Dustyveil (talk) 14:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not going to argue with you about this anymore. The changes you were making were incorrect either because they are standard heading titles like External links or References, or because you were describing multiple things using a singular (e.g. here, where you used 'Player', 'Manager', 'Match', 'All-time result', 'Tournament', 'Individual' etc instead of the correct plural. If you want to get unblocked, use the method described below. In the meantime, please stop pinging me. Number 57 14:58, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Number 57: I'm not arguing about External links and References since you just provided these guildlines, but rule about the remaining headers are dubious or non-existent. And in this Belgium FC, a featured article, can you explain why the section Stadium has no s, also record? Dustyveil (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As I said, I'm not going to argue about this with you anymore. 'Competitive record' is fine as a heading. 'Player' is not. You don't understand basics of English grammar and therefore do not appear to have the competence required to make edits to headings. As you disregarded my request to stop pining me, you are now on my ignore list and I will no longer receive notifications from you. Goodbye. Number 57 15:11, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree:, I'm sory, someone tell me to ask you as you're online. I am blocked just for removing plural 's' from External links and References sections' headings. I'm not used to the guildline regarding usage of plurals for sections in articles. I was not noticing the blocker's warning as it was amidst an edit conflict. I have told the above that I'm not doing it again but this user are now off and won't unblock me. It's so trivial! I just want to continue with other contributions instead of this. Dustyveil (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are removing player nationalities again. You are also removing player positions in violation of the manual of style. Please stop this. Number 57 17:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, changing 'Honours' to 'Titles', again a violation of the manual of style. You will be blocked again if you continue making these edits. Number 57 17:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

It's clear you are the same editor as this ([1]), this ([2]) and numerous others, and were blocked for three months for sockpuppetry. Some of the IPs you used are blocked for a year. Number 57 21:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]