User talk:EMachine03/Archive 2

Manx Fencibles (badminton club)
Hi, I noticed you commented on this AFD. There is a similar AFD going on here, and if you'd like please share your thoughts here as well. . Thanks! Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:44, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm EMachine03. I noticed that you recently removed content from Annales School without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EMachine03 (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

>> Yes. There is a mistake on that page. there is a reference to Kraus' paper 'Appropriation et pratiques de la lecture' that is not correct. Nowhere in the authors' paper, the author presents the information you attributed to her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leguimaraes (talk • contribs) 18:53, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi EMachine03. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3AEMachine03 enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Welcome to WP:STiki!
Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Re: My recent edit
Oops, thanks for the note. I forgot to paste the text from my text editor into the edit window before hitting save. I've fixed it now. Graham 87 14:23, 28 November 2017 (UTC) Understandable. EMachine03 (talk) 14:25, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Re: My recent edit
I'm curious -- I attempted to add a sourced article regarding the trading of Bitcoin futures and it was marked as vandalism. How is a sourced and formatted addition considered vandalism? Honest question, by the way. It seemed to be of relevant interest. 63.224.191.9 (talk) 22:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC) Sorry. I don't know why I did that. Don't worry, I reverted it. EMachine03 (talk) 22:44, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * No worries. Just happy to see that I didn't mess up. 63.224.191.9 (talk) 22:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi
I recently deleted a huge inaccurate block of text in United_Kingdom_agency_worker_law and I received your message concerning my lack of explanation for this. While the first section's informations are correct, the content I deleted was outdated. I am not a regular Wikipedia contributor and I didn't know how to leave explanations, or how to flag the section as inaccurate or outdated.

Sorry! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monsieurmodifications (talk • contribs) 14:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: TonyBallioni (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Re: My recent edit
Hi, you just sent me a message where you said: "I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to A Wild Hare— because it did not appear constructive." I disagree very much with this -- my edit was done to clarify that "The Golden Age of Looney Tunes" home video edition which was referred to in that segment was a LaserDisc edition. I think it's absolutely constructive to inform of the exact home video format in the actual article, rather than having to go on to the LaserDisc's own Wikipedia page to find that out. (I see when reviewing my edit that I made a small typo – it should have said "the LaserDisc series", not "thre LaserDisc series" – but that can easily be corrected.) From my perspective, your reason for removing my added info is unfounded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.221.241.20 (talk) 00:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

CVUA Assignment
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I see that you have extensively reverted vandalism using Huggle, yet you haven't put any of these reversions on the Academy page for a week. Are you still interested in the Academy? Please let me know if you are still interested in finishing the assignment (You can simply put what you have done there to be easy).

Thanks, Hummerrocket  (talk)  22:52, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I'll add some more diffs. EMachine03 (talk) 11:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome Back
Hey, what's up; welcome back! I hope you have had an effective Wikibreak. If you are still interested, would you like to return to the CVUA academy to complete your assignments? Hummerrocket  (talk)  21:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Separate section for future reference
Hello, Can you please roll back to my edit on Maleate isomerase. You just deleted a paragraph I spent an hour editing and all the citations are gone! I didn't delete any thing except an redundant word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinemagenta (talk • contribs) 22:03, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Actually, in your most recent change that I saw when I rolled it back, you removed the entire further reading section without explanation. All of your other edits are fine. I'll try to restore your most recent edit with the further reading section added back. EMachine03 (talk) 22:07, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I just add my comments on why deleting further readings. They were actually not the further readings but old citations before I start to edit this page. All these citations have been incorporated to the reference, so I deleted them. Hope you think it is OK?

Yeah, I understand. However, in the future, can you please remember to sign your talk page posts using the four tides, or ~ ? Also, in the future make sure to place comments in a new section on the talk page and not on the top of the talk page. Thanks. EMachine03 (talk) 22:25, 7 March 2018 (UTC) Sure, thanks. Sorry, still learning...

New Article creation
KankP (talk) 05:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear (User:EMachine03) - I have recently started contributing to Wikipedia community in volunteer capacity and have made a contribution recently (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Omkar_Rai). Since the Article subject I found on many established and authentic sources as notable enough, I created an article on Wikipedia.

Somehow this is marked for deletion and I don't understand why some notable and experienced Wiki admins are putting my contribution in this way. All the references are of very repute, reliable, authentic and prestigious. This article is of great significance in Indian IT world.

Please have a look and suggest me if you see any improvement to help me make my contribution worthy for Wikipedia. It would be of your great help to correct me so that I can contribute to community with best of my volunteer time.

Looking forward to learn and contribute.