User talk:EgyptianSushi

Welcome to my talk page. = Comments = I can't believe no-one has welcomed you yet! Welcome!

I didn't actually go to Schenley, but all of my friends did and I would show up there during school from time to time. So I'm an honorary alum.::: SirWraith 11/28/06

Salad Fingers' teeth
I did some zooming and pausing and in some frames I saw "j" as well as ":)" and something that looked like "FOYK". So it looks like David Firth just writes randomness on SF's teeth to give him those crags. Weird! - Phorque 12:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:YouThink front.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:YouThink front.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 04:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

YT Undelete
I have proposed YT for undelete. I think IAB and YT should have one article under YT.Electricbassguy 05:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

House
My bad. I have a bit of a tendency to jump the gun sometimes ;-) -- BlastOButter42 See  Hear  Speak  03:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

El Norte
Hello. First, good for you for making an argument in your class, don't stop doing that as you go on into college. It's quite admired by professors.

As, I mentioned the article is well sourced (see all the references), that is the difference between a good and bad article on the internet. It's true some are not. However, the argument that "all" info on the internet is questionable is a "sloppy" argument" and it's called a "hasty generalization" in the field of argumentation and debate. If the information has good documentation, and the article in question does, then that argument does not apply. Period!

Just because your teacher heard it on "TV" does not make it reign supreme (she's using the same logic as she gave you...did you notice that?). That line of thinking is quite silly. After all the actor who might have mentioned that is considered a secondary source. Now you have a primary source on the New York Times. Print it out and give it to your teacher. Gregory Nava, the producer/writer/director can be considered a PIMARY SOURCE. (More or less, generally both are considered senconday because they came from a newspaper/television. But Nava's article is better as proof.)

Other liars on television: George W. Bush and his whole administration; the latest Gonzalez. Keep up the good fight, and don't forget to print the articles cited.....

Continue the argument.....if you at last resort need to email the producer Anna Thomas I can help with that. She would probably love to hear from you....again it's fiction based on real circumstances.....

Let me know, Luigibob 22:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Ds lite brightness comparison.gif
Image:Ds lite brightness comparison.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:DS Lite Brightness Comparison.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)