Welcome to my talk page.

Comments[edit]

I can't believe no-one has welcomed you yet! Welcome!

I didn't actually go to Schenley, but all of my friends did and I would show up there during school from time to time. So I'm an honorary alum.::: SirWraith 11/28/06

A welcome from Sputnik[edit]

Hi, EgyptianSushi, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, bonjour, salut, privyet, konichiwa, shalom, hola, salve, sala'am, bonjourno, and hi! I'm Sputnik. I noticed that you were new and/or have yet to receive any messages so I just thought I'd pop in to say "hello". We're glad to have you in our community! I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it's so big but we won't bite so Be Bold and get what you know down in microchips! If you do make a mistake, that's fine, we'll assume good faith and just correct you: it'll take a few seconds maximum! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful. If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you. Here are a few links to get you started:

Always sign your posts on talk pages! That way, others will know who left which comments. You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Simplified Ruleset
How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Wikipedia Glossary

And remember:

If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

P.S. I'm happy to help new users. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Happy Wiki-ing!

Salad Fingers' teeth[edit]

I did some zooming and pausing and in some frames I saw "j" as well as ":)" and something that looked like "FOYK". So it looks like David Firth just writes randomness on SF's teeth to give him those crags. Weird! - Phorque 12:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:YouThink front.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:YouThink front.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:11, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

YT Undelete[edit]

I have proposed YT for undelete. I think IAB and YT should have one article under YT.Electricbassguy 05:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

House[edit]

My bad. I have a bit of a tendency to jump the gun sometimes ;-) -- BlastOButter42 ^See Hear _Speak 03:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

El Norte[edit]

Hello. First, good for you for making an argument in your class, don't stop doing that as you go on into college. It's quite admired by professors.

As, I mentioned the article is well sourced (see all the references), that is the difference between a good and bad article on the internet. It's true some are not. However, the argument that "all" info on the internet is questionable is a "sloppy" argument" and it's called a "hasty generalization" in the field of argumentation and debate. If the information has good documentation, and the article in question does, then that argument does not apply. Period!

Just because your teacher heard it on "TV" does not make it reign supreme (she's using the same logic as she gave you...did you notice that?). That line of thinking is quite silly. After all the actor who might have mentioned that is considered a secondary source. Now you have a primary source on the New York Times. Print it out and give it to your teacher. Gregory Nava, the producer/writer/director can be considered a PIMARY SOURCE. (More or less, generally both are considered senconday because they came from a newspaper/television. But Nava's article is better as proof.)

Other liars on television: George W. Bush and his whole administration; the latest Gonzalez. Keep up the good fight, and don't forget to print the articles cited.....

Continue the argument.....if you at last resort need to email the producer Anna Thomas I can help with that. She would probably love to hear from you....again it's fiction based on real circumstances.....

Let me know, Luigibob 22:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Ds lite brightness comparison.gif[edit]

Image:Ds lite brightness comparison.gif is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:DS Lite Brightness Comparison.gif. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:DS Lite Brightness Comparison.gif]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:52, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]