User talk:El Chivo 2

As a courtesy to other contributors could you please explain controversial or complicated edits on the talk page -- not in your edit summary?
As a courtesy to other contributors could you please explain controversial or complicated edits on the talk page -- not in your edit summary?

You made what seemed to me to be a controversial edit to Raymond Allen Davis -- that you explained only in your edit summary.

As I explained on Talk:Raymond Allen Davis, complicated or controversial edits, that are explained only in an edit summary are the most common trigger for edit warring.

I request you go to the talk page and offer a fuller explanation.

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 09:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * the edit summary is just that, a summary. but, you can see the details of the change by clicking the "prev" link on the left side of the summary.  --El Chivo 2 (talk) 22:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * And, as I explained, it is a technique that triggers edit wars. I avoided the trigger to edit warring.  Instead I have asked you to explain why you think Al Jazeera's English language service is not an "impartial source".  I really think you should make that effort.  Geo Swan (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Al Jazeera controversies and criticism El Chivo 2 (talk) 06:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

No refs on disambiguation pages
Hi, I just undid this edit of yours. See wp:DABREF. - DVdm (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know about that policy. El Chivo 2 (talk) 17:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)