User talk:Electricmic

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

By the way, I noticed you undid some vandalism on the Adobe page. It's usually a good idea to check the page history to ensure you undo all changes made by a vandal (in this case, the vandal did this). When you compare between revisions, you're also given the option to undo that change by clicking on the undo tab, and then confirming that action, which is a lot easier than searching the text for spurious vandalism. I hope this is info is useful to you. (Note: I've reverted all the other vandalism caused by that user in this case.) Mind  matrix  14:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the notice - I've deleted the page Category talk:Religion in Pennsylvania. Yes, it's tiresome dealing with vandals; I'd rather spend my time and effort creating or expanding articles, instead of reviewing other people's changes. I'll leave a warning for that user, but when a vandal edit comes from an IP address, it's likely that other users may see that message instead, because IP addresses may be shared in some environments. Mind  matrix  14:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:AugustePiccardandPaulKipfer.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:AugustePiccardandPaulKipfer.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 22:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:AugustePiccardandPaulKipfer.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:AugustePiccardandPaulKipfer.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MER-C (talk • contribs) 03:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * What we're looking for is for you to forward the permission grant email to permissions-en at wikimedia.org. MER-C 04:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

paramagnetism
Hi,

I have done a pretty extensive rewrite on this page mostly from a solid state chemistry point of view and I'd appreciate if someone would have a look at it. It does not appear there are that many magnetism fans around, but I saw your edit on the page. So, would you do me favor?

Happy 2008! Jcwf (talk) 21:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Eh yah, references... ouch Problem is I have not worked in this area for 20 years or so and this is mostly from memory... Classes I took as a grad and such. :-o. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcwf (talk • contribs) 17:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

March 2010
Um, please don't make edits like this one. It has been identified as vandalism and reverted. You are welcome to submit reliably sourced criticism of the phenomenon for inclusion in the article if such is available. -kotra (talk) 23:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Dear Kotra, Thanks for the speedy clean up of my destructive edit. This was a test/demonstration performed for my class to show that, despite being inherently vulnerable to vandalism, Wikipedia is constantly improving thanks to thoughtful contributions of volunteer editors like yourself. Many students assumed there must be a paid staff of editors working to constantly snuff out vandalism. The success of the Wikipedia project is evidence that there must be more good in the world than bad. User: Electricmic (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * That's fine, and I see your intentions were good, but please don't in the future. If nobody had reverted it (as is sometimes the case), your premise would've been disproven, as I saw recently occur here. (by the way, I can't take credit for reverting you, it was an anonymous IP) -kotra (talk) 18:00, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative
Hi Electricmic,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The  Helpful  Bot  16:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

March 2021
Hello, I'm Sungodtemple. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Cyclotron have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Sungodtemple (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Silent Running
Your edit to Silent Running has been reverted.

Please note that the Plot section should contain the story of the film. It should not contain information about possible connections to other films. In future, please try to avoid adding things to the Plot section that are not plot. -- 109.77.212.235 (talk) 00:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk)  15:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)