User talk:Eleman

NowCommons: File:CaberKalesi.jpg
File:CaberKalesi.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:CaberKalesi.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Seljuk Empire
I appreciate the explanation, so thank you :). It looks a bit awful to my eye, but at least I see where you're coming from. Kafka Liz (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm not sure that's really an overwhelming concensus, but I'll read it over and think on it. Kafka Liz (talk) 17:04, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, Tughril really is a weird word, isn't it? However, for consistency's sake... Eleman (talk) 18:57, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

BazQux Reader moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, BazQux Reader, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lopifalko (talk) 12:38, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of BazQux Reader for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BazQux Reader is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BazQux Reader& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)