User talk:Eoghan888

Image tagging for Image:Michelle Fini.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Michelle Fini.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 23:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Le tissier.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Le tissier.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot (talk) 22:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Michele_Fini.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Michele_Fini.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Flags in infoboxes
Please stop adding flags to infoboxes as you did to Davide Marchini and Clarence Seedorf. This runs contrary to WP:FLAGS and discussions in WP:FOOTY as shown here:


 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Archive_12
 * Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football

If you have any disagreement, feel free to discuss it in the football project talk page. -- Alexf42 22:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. -- Alexf42 22:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Block???!!!
Hey - lay off the little guy! Sarah777 (talk) 23:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Andorra Aug 07 002.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Andorra Aug 07 002.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Lismroe Coat of Arms.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Lismroe Coat of Arms.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Ignazio Carta
You probably noticed the red link. I believe you created this article. Another editor proposed it for deletion, and since no one objected within 7 days, I deleted it. I noticed that it doesn't appear that anyone notified you, however, so I wanted to let you know. Take care, Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  13:48, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:7uu 010.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:7uu 010.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DungarvanCOF.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:DungarvanCOF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Please note, the image has been updated to PNG version to allow a transparent background. Sswonk (talk) 18:45, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * You eejit. (Addressing 888!). Where did you get that from? Sarah777 (talk) 18:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Shy Mr. E got it from the council, see . Is Eoghan888 your cousin? And do you "conveniently neglect" to send the 666's invitations to the reunion? :) Sswonk (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Not shy...just like to keep my head down. I'm sure you understand. TheEditor888 23:36, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I try, Eoghan. To be absolutely clear, you did nothing wrong, though the garish recommended template might make it look that way. I only needed to remove your original version of the coat of arms to change it to a version with a transparent background, because it was uploaded as fair use. That is what my note in italics above was saying. Hope all is well there. Sswonk (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)


 * I have just been asked to test whether I can still edit. I do what I'm told. TheEditor888 23:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Check your pic of Keem Bay
What I did was too obvious?! Sarah777 (talk) 01:32, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey - at least this one hasn't been deleted for breach of copyright or whatever! First time for everything :) Sarah777 (talk) 01:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Unbreakable (Michael Jackson song) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Unbreakable (Michael Jackson song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)