User talk:ErgoSum88/Archive 10

Thanks
Thanks for all your hard work on the Federal Bridge Gross Weight Formula. It is a random, but interesting topic. Remember (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Congratulations - I remember this one from peer review, great to see it on the Main Page! Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 17:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Mind giving an article a review?
Ergosum, How's life? Long time no talk. When you have some time, could you review Thistle, Utah? I honestly thought I had everything worked out, but it failed FAC with 1 oppose vote for "needs a copyedit". Which is fair, I'm the first to admit I'm a sloppy writer. Anyways, the FAC is over and done with, so no rush. I was just hoping to get some extra eyes so I could re-submit in a few months.

Thanks much Dave (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Yeah I'll see what I can do for it. I'm so tired right now I can't even muster up small talk... so I will see you later! -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  00:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There's no hurry. Get some rest! Dave (talk) 02:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. FYI, 1950 was the last census where Thistle was counted as a seperate city. As such, there are no figures for 1960 or 1970. One of the sources estimates the population at about 50 by 1983. Also, I'm not sure what a beanery is either. Dave (talk) 03:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Also, if you don't mind. I found a couple of more pics in my archives. Is the number of pics ok? or is that now too many? Dave (talk) 04:31, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The number of pics looks fine to me, but I'm using a netbook with a tiny screen. Perhaps a disclaimer noting 1950 as the last year census figures are available would be appropriate. And as far as "beanery" goes, I googled it and was given the definition "an inexpensive restaurant", which was not what I had envisioned! I was picturing a warehouse where workers process beans or something. -- ErgoSum • talk • trib  02:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing that. Dave (talk) 02:53, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

scorpian mezcal???????
uuuuuuuu iiiiiiii!... scaryThelmadatter (talk) 01:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

JWH-018 legality in NC
Your edit of JWH-018 whose comment says "update arkansas" actually updated NC. I added a section to the talk page; can you comment there? Yuubi (talk) 23:01, 17 November 2010 (UTC)