User talk:Evilemperorzorg

Welcome Evilemperorzorg! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are users!

Hello, Evilemperorzorg. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Jax 0677, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own private sandbox] for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

 Sincerely, Jax 0677 (talk) 16:26, 3 July 2013 (UTC)  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jax_0677&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Proposed deletion of 4D Rulers
Hello, Evilemperorzorg. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 4D Rulers, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Longbyte1 (talk) 16:22, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Thessaloniki landmarks.png
Thanks for uploading File:Thessaloniki landmarks.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Thessaloniki landmarks.png
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Thessaloniki landmarks.png

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:00, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Εικόνα Θεσσαλονίκης
Γεια σου φίλε μου. Επειδή είμαστε στην Αγγλική Βικιπαίδεια, θα γράψω στα Αγγλικά σε περίπτωση που θέλει κάποιος να παρέμβει στη συζήτηση (το θέμα της εικόνας είναι πολυσυζητημένο). There has already been a (quite lengthy) discussion on the Thessaloniki talk page about what image to put in the infobox. The image you want to put on it is, in fact, my own image. First of all, it should probably be deleted because it probably violates people's copyrights. Secondly, the discussion I talked about concluded in that we should use just a single image for Thessaloniki and we chose the white tower. I think it is actually quite a nice view of the tower anyway. Regards, --Philly boy92 (talk) 22:46, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ancient Gitani (November 20)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander The Great Statue (Thessaloniki) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander The Great Statue (Thessaloniki), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Phillip II at Vergina's tomb
In reference to Vergina. I don't know if Androniko's claim is now supported by most archaeologists, or if the new discoveries support his claim. Reading that section, it sounds like it's still undecided.

However, I am not knowledgeable about this topic, and I am not familiar with this topic. If you think it's fine this way, then it's also fine with me. --Enric Naval (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

No problem :) Most claims come from our neighborhood country just to decrease the importance of ancient Macedonian sites in Greece. Of course there are people who want to examine it more but just to let you know! Those just question if it belongs to Philip III son of Philip II or Philip II himself. But most have agreed because of the skeleton injuries which are recorded by ancient historians that it belongs to Philip II.

Just for your information this has also been claimed...

"Instead, according to Borza, Tomb I, also known as the Tomb of Persephone may have contained the remains of Phillip II and his family. If this theory is true, then the golden weaponry and royal objects found in Tomb II may have belonged to Alexander the Great."

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander The Great Statue (Thessaloniki)


Hello Evilemperorzorg. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Alexander The Great Statue (Thessaloniki)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &mdash; rybec   21:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Aerial view of the archaeological site of Nekromanteion.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Aerial view of the archaeological site of Nekromanteion.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:47, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ancient Gitani concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ancient Gitani, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Georgios Papadopoulos, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dr.  K.  16:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)