User talk:Fadesga/Archives/2014/July

re: Category:German diplomat stubs
Hello, just letting you know that after you created Category:German diplomat stubs in March (!) you apparently forgot to remove the template. This listed it at Category:Pages actively undergoing a major edit. I've removed the template so all is good.--220  of  Borg 01:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Benn Steil
Hello, Fadesga,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Benn Steil should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Benn Steil.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 17:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Cockett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Williams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Future year categories
I've nominated a number of categories for future years for upmerge to existing century and millennium articles, on the grounds that the base year article does not and should not yet exist. See Categories for discussion/Log/2014 July 28 and Categories for discussion/Log/2014 July 28.

I also noticed you have clearly incorrect sort keys for some of the new (and old) categories. Basically, the purpose of the sort keys is to get the categories in chronological order. In and  (for which I question the presence of future millennia), it should either be unkeyed, or perhaps have the 4th millennium have key 3XXX, and the 10th and 11th millennia should have different keys to force the sort order correct. Similarly in, and other categories which have future millennia. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 09:20, 28 July 2014 (UTC)