User talk:Fadesga/Archives/2021/August

Edit summary usage
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks!

''Hi there Fadesga. I just happened to notice your edit summary usage is very low, and that you've been requested to provide edit summaries several times, most recently in May 2020. That being said, you are an experienced, veteran editor and your contributions are much valued. I'm not here to give you a hard time about it, you may edit as you please, I'm just curious about what your reasoning is.. why do you prefer to not use edit summaries? I find them very helpful and time-saving when checking contributions, do you not also?'' -- &oelig; &trade; 11:07, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of TAXI (website) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TAXI (website) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/TAXI (website) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 16:53, 30 August 2021 (UTC)