User talk:FantinoFalco

Welcome!
Hello, FideKoeln, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Ossoff1.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ossoff1.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 07:45, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to 2019 Speaker of the United States House of Representatives election, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you add the vote tallies (or note that there were 3 present votes, 1 member absent, and 1 seat vacant) you get 430 votes. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 00:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

sorry, my bad. Was already reverted, when I noticed my mistake

May 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Michael Grimm (politician). Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Andy Biggs
FantinoFalco, I'm not trying to give you a hard time or anything, but when you start analyzing primary sources in attempt to "contradict" someone's argument, that's not only original research, that's also synthesis. We simply can't have that in a BLP. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Again FantinoFalco, I'm not trying to be overly bureaucratic with you, but you must know that the Rachel Maddow Show is unacceptable for statements of fact. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * No I don't. You have the resolution which clearly is not supporting what Biggs said. You have MSNBC stating the same. --FantinoFalco (talk) 20:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The Rachel Maddow Show is an opinion talk show--we can't use them for facts. Why didn't you just use the Phoenix New Times in the beginning? They seem like an appropriate source. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 20:56, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

I can't find a public reference stating that Andy Biggs attended Sahuaro High School in Tucson but I was there at the same time. I think he was a year ahead of me. Eegorr (talk) 00:56, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you can't find a reference you can't include it in the article. Imagine somebody would claim he was in a Satanic Temple with him and we all would accept that because user told us so --FantinoFalco (talk) 04:33, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

August 2021 - Violating the three-revert rule
Your recent editing history at Opinion polling for the next Polish parliamentary election shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Natanieluz (talk) 10:44, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Natanieluz (talk) 10:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Opinion polling for the next Polish parliamentary election) for disruptive editing. You may still edit the talk page of the article, and eery other article in Wikipedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Black Kite (talk) 12:14, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)