User talk:Faraz

I reserve the right to remove any irrelevant information or personal attack statements from the list below.

Welcome message
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! --Hemanshu 20:28, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

Pakistan task force
Hi! Looking at some of your contributions, I believe that you have an interest in Pakistan-military related articles. I was wondering if you are interested to join this project: WikiProject Pakistani military history. It is a WikiProject designed and intended to focus on the improvement and mantainance of all Pakistani military and military-history related articles on Wikipedia. If you are interested, please list yourself in the participants section.....we are in search of some willing people :) Autsa (talk) 03:34, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

hbo/catoon network
according to the hbo asia website there is no dedicated beam for pakistan, according to the website pakistan is covered by the hbo south asia beam of which ary digital is the authorized distributor for hbo in the territory of pakistan.

cartoon network had launched a pakistan specific beam which didnt yield out results as they had expected which led the channel to relay the cartoon network hq beam. http://europe.turnerinfo.com/CN/PAN/schedules/index.jsp <--- check out the schedule and match what you see on tv and then give me a buzz. dopekhor

Image tags
Thanks for contributing to wikipedia. I saw that you have uploaded some pictures. I have added tags to them. Please see Fair_use_rationale and add information to your images. You can check similar images with fairuse tags to see how people are using it. Thanks --Stonewash 10:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Pakistan Military UN Missions
Good job on the Military of Pakistan - United Nations Peacekeeping missions.

Although a list is good, if you can get some text and make it an article instead of a list article. It would be better. Like explaining the history of Pakistan in UN, the number of personnel in UN, why Pakistan send its troops there, what kind of specialties that Pakistani troops offered which no other country did, how did the people in those countries receive Pakistani troops, etc.

Get the proper information and I will help you fix it up. Also, go to other peace keeping missions by other countries and see if this is the standard article name for such operations. Mercenary2k 00:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Do this. Message, this person

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kirill_Lokshin

He is the head wikipedian in regards to military matters. Ask him about comments and suggestions for the Pakistani UN Page you created and the appropriate title for it. Mercenary2k 00:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: New article
Well, I'm generally not in favor of using unnecessary punctuation in article titles (it makes them rather messy to link to), so I'd suggest trying to get rid of the dash, at least. I would suggest either one of: or, alternately, if we can trim the UN part, the simpler: Hope that helps! Kirill Lokshin 01:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * UN peacekeeping missions involving the military of Pakistan
 * UN peacekeeping missions involving Pakistan
 * Peacekeeping operations involving the military of Pakistan
 * Peacekeeping operations involving Pakistan

Great Job
Great Job on the Pakistani UN Article.

What you could do in the Military of Pakistan page is create a separate section which gives a brief summary of Pakistani UN Missions and give the link to this article. Also, move the Table at the bottom and move the text to the start of this article.

You should also give a brief summary in the start of the article about the histroy of Pakistani UN missions and its current status.

But other than that, a great job. Mercenary2k 05:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

title for article
I suggest you go with this.

UN peacekeeping missions involving Pakistan

Mercenary2k 22:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:103 JPG.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:103 JPG.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 00:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Great Power
That article it self is totally baseless and irrelevant.

It is not including major global powers such as the Roman Empire, Spanish and Portuguese Empires, the Dutch, Chinese, Byzantine, Persian, etc.

I made changes to the Indian section.

Mercenary2k 02:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

3rr vio
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. ThLinGan 02:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Assalaam Aleykum. Your approach to invite another party is a good idea in this case. ThLinGan 02:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:F7pg-5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:F7pg-5.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

yeah, u're right
I'm sorry I didn't read up on that, probably the lack of time these days on my part, meant I assumed it was just a drive by POV tagging as is occuring in many WP articles. Personally I feel that DLinth is pushing the envelope by saying that India controls 100% of the Glacier; I hope you guys can resolve the issue soon. Thanks. --Idleguy 01:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mirage5sea PAF.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mirage5sea PAF.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Jf-17-Tarmac.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jf-17-Tarmac.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith&#39;s 22:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Chief of Staff Inspecting the Plane.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Chief of Staff Inspecting the Plane.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith&#39;s 22:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:JF-17 in Pakistan.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JF-17 in Pakistan.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith&#39;s 22:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jf-17-Tarmac.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jf-17-Tarmac.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. John Smith&#39;s 22:12, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image rationale
Thanks for uploading Image:Ssg-in-action.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Idleguy 04:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:103 JPG.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:103 JPG.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:34, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Pakistan military template
Hi Faraz! I would like to draw your attention to the infobox in all Pakistan military articles. Currently it does not have a flag, as the Pak mil flag uploaded by someone has been deleted. I don't know how to edit this infobox, as there seems to be no link and all i see is or something like that. Can you please tell me how this can be fixed? I can upload the Pak mil flag under the proper rationales. Zaindy87 08:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:F7pg-5.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:F7pg-5.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 13:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Pak-army-commandos.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pak-army-commandos.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  18:33, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:ArmyPictures02.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ArmyPictures02.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  18:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mirage5sea PAF.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mirage5sea PAF.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 03:11, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Pakistan
WikiProject Pakistan Newsletter Shi'a-Sunni sectarianism! What next? Wikipedia has always had its fair share of disputes. The issues surrounding debates like creationism-evolutionism had been a source of many edit wars. But recently enough, the ball-of-chaos had landed in our very own court. Pakistani issues are now polluted with a new sectarianism, especially the biographical articles celebrating some of the most influential people in Pakistani politics. These edit wars annoyed administrators who had no idea how the problems should be dealt with. Instances of religious inclination (either Shi'a Islam or Sunni Islam) were changed from one or the other. Debates have kicked off on the WP Pakistan talk page. Recently enough, a new policy has come into discussion (actually, it's just a set of rules) that defines major guidlines for such issues. It now awaits votes from all Pakistani editors. In other news: Akhtar Hameed Khan has finally reached the FA status and Islescape is the happiest person on Earth.

Fair use rationale for Image:Al-zarrar.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Al-zarrar.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Image:23-03-08 0657.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:23-03-08 0657.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:05, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Pakistani date formats
Hello Faraz,

I'm trying to update Calendar date. When Pakistanis write dates with numerals only, is it true that both the year first (2008-11-16) and day first (16-11-2008) formats are used? Does it make any difference if you're writing in Urdu, English, or state languages? Is the US month-first system ever used?

Thanks, kwami (talk) 22:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

What is your e-mail
I want to talk to you about something.User talk:Yousaf465

FS
see this .Really important.User:Yousaf465 (talk)

Ra'ad and Babur cruise missile title change?
Do you think the title of the pages should be changed to "Ra'ad cruise missile" and "Babur cruise missile"? Hj108 (talk) 14:35, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

New! Pakistani military history task force
&emsp;&emsp;

I am contacting you because I see you have contributed to articles about the military history of Pakistan or its armed forces. To help improve Wikipedia's coverage of this important topic, and to provide support and coordination of individual editors, the Military history WikiProject has now set up a newPakistani military history task force.

If you would like to join up, as a founder member of this important new initiative, please add your name to the Participants' List. Thank you for your time. I hope you can help. Roger Davies talk 06:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Urdu Wikipedia
Dear friend,

You seem to be an active Wikipedian from Pakistan. We have an Urdu Wikipedia that needs all the help that it can get. Currently, we do not have many active users and we will really appreciate if you would consider becoming an active contributor. As you are already familiar with Wikipedia's style and rules, your presence would also help elevate the overall content quality.

Hope to see you soon at Urdu Wikipedia

Regards,

Kashif Aqeel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.223.190.189 (talk) 04:30, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Join us at FB
Hello Pakistanis Wikipedians! Assalam-o-Alaikum, I hope you are enjoying editing Wikipedia and helping around. I want to join every Pakistani Wikipedian on facebook so I hope you would like to join us in our community. We would/could help each other and make Pakistani articles more better.

Join us:
 * Group: Pakistani Wikipedians
 * Page: Pakistani Wikipedians

And then sign my guestbook for memories.

Regards: --  Captain Wikipedia!     ( T - C  - G  ) 12:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to WLM!
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Pakistan User Group
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan


'''Hi !

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive
Hi !

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Arif Nizami, Azhar Abbas (journalist)
Arif Nizami, Azhar Abbas (journalist) are up for deletion Articles for deletion/Azhar Abbas (journalist) Articles for deletion/Arif Nizami. Can you please help in improving these articles and defect deletion attempt.--Spasage (talk) 14:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Use of unrelaible sources
Hello, I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sukhoi Su-30, but you didn't provide a valid reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial. Please cite to reliable media article and not forum pages per WP:Reliable sources. Regards, -Fnlayson (talk) 22:23, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * My source is IndiaToday TV Channel how is that not realiable? Faraz (talk) 22:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, but the other source was still a link to a discussion forum page. -Fnlayson (talk) 22:51, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Misrepresentation of sources
Stop misrepresenting what sources say - none of the sources you are using say that Pakistan has claimed that a Su-30 has been shot down or that the pilot has been killed - the claim that a Su-30 has been shot down is attributed to a tweet by a news editor - a tweet by one news editor does not represent the government of Pakistan, or the PAF making the claim and is merely media speculation.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Also stop edit warring and use talk page instead.  M L talk 13:45, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019
Your recent editing history at Sukhoi Su-30 ‎ shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. McSly (talk) 13:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)