User talk:Felix558

Ways to improve NGC 4252
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Felix558, thanks for creating NGC 4252!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.
 * Please would you improve your references so that the data on the individual galaxy can be found? At the moment, all your NGC articles are only linking to the home page of the online database, not the entry about the system itself. I'm sure you appreciate that this isn't really sufficient. We need links or references that support the actually data you've included, and this should not be a difficult step for you to do, as you will have already been using that page to extract the information. e.g.http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/cgi-bin/objsearch?objname=NGC+4252&extend=no&hconst=73&omegam=0.27&omegav=0.73&corr_z=1&out_csys=Equatorial&out_equinox=J2000.0&obj_sort=RA+or+Longitude&of=pre_text&zv_breaker=30000.0&list_limit=5&img_stamp=YES I expect you could find a shorter url - this was taken from the search results.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page.
 * I might also suggest that you don't archive all your feedback immediately. I know that multiple page review comments may appear to bulk out your talk Page, but I can assure you this is a really useful way for other editors to see what feedback a new editor has been receiving, and to help and guide them where necessary. (See Help:Archiving a talk page) Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 12:36, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * I have updated "NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database" references in my NGC articles with more specific links, as you suggested. Thank you once again for your useful comments!  Felix558 (talk) 03:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Huggle warned the wrong person, that's new. Sorry! Pewwer42 Talk  02:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)


 * No problem! Fight against vandalism can lead to confusion sometimes, with so many edits that should be reverted on so many articles
 * Felix558 (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

America Monday Edit
The student names were all referenced in the various articles cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichelleLutrell (talk • contribs) 04:54, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of NGC 1016 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NGC 1016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NGC 1016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sam-2727 (talk) 16:41, 18 January 2021 (UTC)