User talk:Filmcom

Archive

WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter
The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Voting
The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:47, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter
The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILMS October Newsletter
The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

My recommendation
I recommend that you go ahead and put the links back that he removed. It was a harmless internet quiz, and I hardly think it qualifies as sopboxing. I may not agree with that test, but I'll support your freedom of expression. Worldruler20 (talk) 01:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree it's harmless, but it's definitely soapboxing. If a user had a link to a Muslim apologist site on their profile, then that would be inappropriate too. WP:SOAP.--SuaveArt (talk) 06:40, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * On the advice of three users, I would like to get an outside party's view on this matter (I'll probably be commenting on this). In the meantime, I'm reverting your edits, and ask that you leave the links be until there is a consensus on whether or not I can have them. If the links are truly harmless (about which you agreed with Worldrule20), surely you won't have a problem with this. God bless, Filmcom (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Baily Bridge


The article Baily Bridge has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article seems to be false and the source is either outdated or is a false fact. It is clearly known that this bridge is neither the highest nor appears to be a known. Hence I propose to Delete this bridge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tall.kanna (talk) 02:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Ichthus: January 2012
 In this issue...

- Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia &bull; It is published by WikiProject Christianity For submissions contact the Newsroom &bull; To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
 * From the Editor
 * What are You doing For Lent?
 * Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
 * Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

Move Canon C300 to Canon EOS C300
Please join the proposed move discussion on Talk:Canon C300. --Dmitry (talk•contibs) 07:10, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of Baily Bridge


The article Baily Bridge has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG. Not verifiable through any reliable or any official source. No images, no geo location. Looking at the confluence 34.59417°N, 76.12028°W of the subject rivers the highest altitude of the surrounding peaks is below 4000m. Mehra j Mir  (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Mehra j Mir  (talk) 15:21, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Baily Bridge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baily Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Baily Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Mehra j Mir  (talk) 04:23, 10 October 2020 (UTC)