User talk:FimusTauri

 It is easier to follow discussions if they are kept in one place. Messages posted here will be replied to here. If I message you, I will watch your page for a response. Please note that 'real-world' issues are restricting my time on Wikipedia for a short while. I hope to be back soon

"The zero-energy universe" article
Hello, I read your objections to my text, but I do not understand what is contrary to cosmological knowledge. The energy of the universe equals zero because negative energy of gravity "cancels" the positive energy of matter. Therefore, the energy of the universe is zero. However, there must be positive (normal) energy and negative (gravitational) energy so that the energy of the universe is zero and the universe could create matter. Everything I wrote above results from the article. So what is incorrect here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.176.198 (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Christopher Isham, a British quantum cosmologist, in “Quantum Cosmology and the Origin of the Universe” points out that there still needs to be “ontic seeding” to create the positive and negative energy in the first place, even if on balance its sum is zero. (I apologize for writing from different IPs, but this is because of my job. The first part is also mine.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.173.176.135 (talk) 16:08, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

"Zero-energy universe" what is at odds
Can you explain to me what is at odds with your cosmological understanding in the article "zero-energy universe"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.221.121.73 (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2020 (UTC)