User talk:FishandChipper/Archives/2022/November

Speedy deletion nomination of Seán Carrabine
Hello FishandChipper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Seán Carrabine for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Seán Carrabine to be deleted, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Tailteann Cup
I edited the two draft entries from Template:2022 Tailteann Cup Team of the Year. Do you think they are ready for mainspace now? --Gaois (talk) 21:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You need to avoid the use of sensationalised language. Currently both articles read like they're news reports and not like encyclopedia articles. Terms like "important saves" and "steered the ball" are too casual and overly sensational. I know getting the hang of it is tough but otherwise the articles look good. Read WP:TONE for more info on how to improve them. :) FishandChipper 🐟🍟 10:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

I like Bebop too...
Wanted to let you know I did some housekeeping edits at the twins webpage that you edit. Was taken there by a family member, and I only edit in support of WP:VERIFY, so noted a couple cases where sources were misused. Cheers. Enjoy Saul; went to grad school with his talented brother. 2601:246:C700:2:81F3:9036:A0D:88AF (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Christianity
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Christianity you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jenhawk777 -- Jenhawk777 (talk) 05:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Seramikaru in 2018.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Seramikaru in 2018.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Moving to draft space
Hello. If you move articles to draft space, please deselect "leave a redirect" as there shouldn't be redirects from main space to draft space. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 20:41, 17 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry but I dont think Draftify has that option. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 20:52, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Seramikaru moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Seramikaru, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 13:27, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prime Asia TV


The article Prime Asia TV has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable channel failing WP:GNG. Completely unsourced; WP:BEFORE found a single routine news article and also other references about Prime Asia Television, e.g., 1, but I don't see evidence of WP:GNG being met."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  VickKiang  (talk)  02:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry this automatic message via Twinkle is notified to you, of course you were not the page creator, but User:Seffi ditch is. I've pinged them here so they are aware of the PROD, please ignore this message, many thanks!  VickKiang  (talk)  02:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem! FishandChipper 🐟🍟 07:14, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Keilyllí de la Mora
This is about real world. Xx236 (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You have not shown her to be notable in any way. You can't make articles about just anyone. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 13:59, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 'This user has been on Wikipedia for 1 year, 1 month and 28 days'. I have been here for ages and I have a real life experience. You have not shown to be a partner for a discussion about a victim of totalitarian system.Xx236 (talk) 14:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok and? Just cause you've been here a long time doesn't mean you write good articles. Please research what Ad Hominem means before saying shit like that. I could even report your for WP:PA for that. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 14:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Your User page
Consider deleting recent contributions from your User page (=clutter). Anyone who wants to see your contributions can click on Contributions. David notMD (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2022 (UTC)


 * No, I don't think I will. It's there for me, not you. I don't care if someone else doesn't like it. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 10:24, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You may have a valid reason, but you are quite literally required to care. Per WP:NOTWEBHOST: "The focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration." Ignoring others' potentially legitimate concerns is not collaboration. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:26, 24 November 2022 (UTC)

Draftifying pages out of process
Hello, I noticed that Sexton Blake bibliography was missing. You shouldn't draftify pages you have already nominated for AfD, that is considered a WP:SUPERVOTE if the discussion isn't finished and is against Wikipedia rules. I would suggest reversing the process. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:10, 24 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, FishandChipper,
 * I think you should stop drafitifying pages immediately. Recently created articles can be moved from main space to Draft space ONCE and you repeatedly move-warred over Draft:Sodnomzundui Erdene moving it repeatedly to Draft space. That is the same as edit-warring and is worthy of a block. If an editor disagrees with a move to Draft space, they can move the article back, no problem you shouldn't get into a battle over it. If you do move-war again, you will be blocked. Liz Read! Talk! 07:20, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I was only doing so as the article was very clearly not ready for article space. It seems that the editor didn't realize this and despite telling them they continued to do so. FishandChipper 🐟🍟 11:23, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)