User talk:FiveColourMap

Welcome!

 * }

Orion–Eridanus Superbubble
Try not to be s rude in your edit summary's, I did not have a great deal of time spare in creating the article. Nice job though well done. The Last Angry Man (talk) 23:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Kill the gays article
Re:this - your second version (which mentions the death penalty) looks OK to me. Raul654 (talk) 15:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks. I just found a section on the talk page that looks even better. FiveColourMap (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Hiya, on that particular article, I'd probably hold off on editing the section currently under discussion. It's not that I agree or disagree with your edits (I haven't even looked at them, to be honest). It's that it might be misconstrued as "jumping the gun" during a consensus forming process. Best, Rob R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 04:25, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * On second thought, nevermind... I doubt anyone would be at odds with the change you made. Pretend I didn't say anything at all. ;-) Best, Rob R OBERT M FROM LI &#124; TK/CN 04:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia: questions answered before I even finish writing them (edit conflict just now). Thanks for the heads up, though. FiveColourMap (talk) 04:31, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Rudness
Little nerd behind your keyboard: Behave. BatteryIncluded (talk) 04:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Have we met? Would you please express your concerns in a civil tone? I have no idea what is the root of this unexpected hostility. FiveColourMap (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Discussion
I started a discussion .Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 04:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for making your points at the talkpage instead of relying solely on terse and generic edit summaries. You may be interested to read the site policy on edit warring, as your persistent reversal to your proposed text quite clearly qualifies despite the above. FiveColourMap (talk) 20:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Polymer Library


The article Polymer Library has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)