User talk:Frenchhousefantatic

Welcome Frenchhousefantatic! Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are users!

Hello, Frenchhousefantatic. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Smsarmad, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type  here on your talk page, and someone will try to help. Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes   at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp. The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Mypage/sandbox&action=edit&preload=Template:User_Sandbox/preload create your own private sandbox] for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put  on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

 Sincerely, S M S   Talk 17:14, 4 July 2012 (UTC)   [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Smsarmad&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Welcome_to_Wikipedia/user-talk_preload (Leave me a message)]

Español

Deutsch

Français

Italiano

עברית

Русский

日本語

Polski

فارسی

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Laura Norton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Ritchie333  (talk)  19:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 22:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:14, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Esther
Hello there. I do have to say that the reason you gave when undoing the edit did not make sense to me. In addition, Wikipedia does not need extremely long plot detail adding. Wikipedia is not a fansite used to store all the going on of a soap character's fictional life. We keep plot updates concise. Rain  the 1  18:14, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hell again. Congratulations on maintaining such an interesting job. However, that does not put you in a better position to edit Esther Bloom. You actually made the article worse rather than better. I am more than happy to start a discussion on the talk page; but I am fairly confident that other editors will not endorse your large plot updates [as already seems to be the case]. Per essay suggestions in WP:PLOTSUM and WP:PLOTSUMMARIZE [which are endorsed by the community] .. keep it concise. A consensus formed via editors of WP:SOAPS - Other participants in wikiprojects under the scope of ficitional characters often say the same thing. I disagree with everything you said. Fansites go into too much detail. If the reader wants more plot details, I would suggest they visit a fansite. This is not an FA article in question - so why bring that up? And let me tell you, if you think that a FAR looks for excessively long plot summarries when reviewing FACs ... think again. Rain  the 1  18:13, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You need to familiarise yourself with how things really work on here. Plenty of discussion has gone into citing sources - there is a standard - which I follow. I will not go against those because you do not agree. Personification is encouraged of the reporter is actually encouraged. Take it up with the rule, not the follower of the rule. No one is ignoring youur profession, I congratualed you on it - but it still does not give you a better handle on the ways of Wikipedia. Rain  the 1  18:57, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laura Norton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Unknown and Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Sue Perkins
While some of your changes may have been improvements, a significant number of them added non-neutral language--things like "continues to have a long-standing", "notable appearances", "following the success", etc. Additionally, some of the changes introduced language that is too casual/flowery for an encyclopedia aricle, like "alongside friend and creative partner" and "whilst". If you're willing to go back in and fix those problems, I won't revert you, but with those included, they make the article significantly worse, in that they directly violate WP:NPOV. So, are you willing to fix those problems? Qwyrxian (talk) 14:13, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)