User talk:GeauxDevils

August 2019

 * --Jorm (talk) 15:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Your recent editing history at Center for Immigration Studies shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jorm (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * You are a profoundly unintelligent person . I added the information about him being a white nationalist back in, and that's not really relevant to the edit. But of course, you know that--you just have an agenda to push, and you're not smart enough to hide behind neutrality or your mod position effectively . GeauxDevils (talk) 18:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Wow. Okay. Well. Feel free to revert, just know that I have a report queued up for you.--Jorm (talk) 18:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm embarrassed for you. GeauxDevils (talk) 19:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm Wallyfromdilbert. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Tucker Carlson, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The citations you provided are not reliable sources, including the Daily Caller which is deprecated and should not be used as a source for factual information, and Media Matters which is an opinionated biased source that would need to be attributed. More information about these sources can be found in WP:RSP. Thank you.'' – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 17:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks Dougie.

January 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Center for Immigration Studies; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jorm (talk) 23:20, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Center for Immigration Studies. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Doug Weller talk 11:38, 15 January 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Center for Immigration Studies; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Final warning  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 19:33, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

February 2020
Your recent editing history at Center for Immigration Studies shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You've hit 4RR. You should self-revert so that you're in violation of 3RR.'' Jorm (talk) 19:10, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok Brandon