User talk:Geneticcuckoo

Welcome!
Hello, Geneticcuckoo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Yunshui 雲‍水 13:41, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

In response to your feedback
Yunshui 雲‍水 13:34, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221(talk&#124;contrib) 12:03, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ida Freund
Yngvadottir (talk) 08:03, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Torture Museum, Amsterdam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 18:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Nullomers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to ATP, ROS and Fruitfly


 * Pomato (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Chimera and Hybrid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

PowerPoint presentation used in Australia
Dear Geneticcuckoo, You are considered by some to be awesome and were nominated for a real life award for your work at an edit-a-thon. Please would you post the PowerPoint presentation you used to educate new editors in the Wiki Commons. Then, put a link to it on my talk page. I would like to see it. Geraldshields11 (talk) 20:50, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tulip Museum, Amsterdam concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tulip Museum, Amsterdam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tulip Museum, Amsterdam concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tulip Museum, Amsterdam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elizabeth S. Russell concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elizabeth S. Russell, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Elizabeth S. Russell


Hello Geneticcuckoo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Elizabeth S. Russell".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 03:06, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Addgene Logo.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Addgene Logo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

H-principle
Hello. I saw you edited homotopy principle to say that it "was then further developed by Agnar Höskuldsson". I am not sure that is correct. Höskuldsson did write an article "H-methods in applied sciences" but I think this is not related to the h-principle in the sense of homotopy principle. The H in Höskuldsson's article refers to Heisenberg, as I understand it, while the H in h-principle refers to homotopy. Furthermore, the references in Höskuldsson's article does not seem to include any geometry or topology papers. So I think there are two different things both called the h-principle. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:34, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henrik Verder
Hello, Geneticcuckoo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Henrik Verder, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Henrik Verder to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, 220  of  Borg 19:00, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--220  of  Borg 19:49, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Albert G. Richards
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Albert G. Richards, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://flowerxrays.com/bio.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:14, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Photography of Henrik Verder.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Photography of Henrik Verder.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 19:53, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Geneticcuckoo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Albert G. Richards has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:44, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bionic (musician)
Hello, Geneticcuckoo. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Bionic (musician), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Fisheriesmgmt (talk) 06:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bionic (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bionic (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bionic (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:46, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Tulip Museum concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tulip Museum, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tulip Museum


Hello, Geneticcuckoo. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tulip Museum".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Contacting Editors from the Ada Lovelace Editathons
Hi Geneticcuckoo,

I hope you don’t mind me contacting you via your talk page. I’m a new Editor to Wikipedia, part of a small research team based at the University of Birmingham in the UK. I’m getting in touch as we’re trying to contact all the Editors who were involved in the Ada Lovelace Editathons in Oxford or London. If you have been, or still are, involved in editing, whatever the scale of your involvement, we would be very grateful for the opportunity to talk to you about your experiences. In the first instance, we’ve set up a short (10 minute) survey, which you can access via my User Talk Pages. If you are interested in helping with our research project, please can you drop me a line?

Thanks, RuthPage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:31, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Elizabeth Bragg) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Elizabeth Bragg, Geneticcuckoo!

Wikipedia editor SamHolt6 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Reviewed, thanks for creating!"

To reply, leave a comment on SamHolt6's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

SamHolt6 (talk) 09:48, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elizabeth Knight (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Elizabeth Knight (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Animalparty! (talk) 13:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Emma G. Cummings
Hello, Geneticcuckoo,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Emma G. Cummings should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Emma G. Cummings.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Geneticcuckoo, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you've recently created a few women scientist biographies. I hope there will be many more. You might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or if you need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Alice Archenhold) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Alice Archenhold.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Blythwood (talk) 00:27, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, her Wikidata page cites a now-taken-down Berlin city government page on the street naming which confirms the date of death and adds a bit more biographical information. I've added it as another citation. Blythwood (talk) 00:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Louise Sherwood McDowell) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Louise Sherwood McDowell.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

--Animalparty! (talk) 00:49, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Not quite how disambiguation works
Hello. I've just nominated the Fanny Moser disambiguation page for deletion after removing the link to a non-existent article. The purpose of disambiguation pages is to help users find information that's here regarding ambiguously named topics. See MOS:DABRED.

Also, when you do disambiguate a title, the disambiguator should be something pertinent to what the subject is known for. If there were articles on two Fanny Mosers, the one that was already here would be better titled "Fanny Moser (baroness)" or "Fanny Moser (Swiss heiress)", or something like that, whereby people would be most likely to discern whether this is the Fanny Moser they're looking for. What a woman's family name was before she was married beside the point of most people's interest in her, and to choose that as a disambiguator where you'd have no equivalent recourse for married men having the same name is pretty sexist. Largoplazo (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Dear Largoplazo, I am not an expert at the nuances of Wikipedia formatting, however I was trying to create a disambiguation page as there are two women with the exact same name, one of which I was creating a new page for as part of the Wikipedia Women in Red group (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Missing_articles_by_occupation/Scientists). Yes, I do appreciate feedback and help in improving my edits, however you do come across as quiet aggressive by accusing me of sexism. I simply looked up other example disambiguation pages and copied how they disambiguate between two individuals with the same name, and the example I saw used maiden names. Yes, I am happy to take your suggestion and make the relevant corrections, but if we want to encourage new editors to join Wikipedia, especially women, then maybe offering support rather than hostility would be preferable. Geneticcuckoo (talk) 22:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That's quite ironic. I would expect a vigilant feminist to pounce on any man who chose to distinguish two like-named women, not according to whether one was Scottish and one was Polish, or whether one was a minister and the other a physicist, as he would for two men, but according to their maiden names. So, here, I speak up for women and I get shot down. Damned if I do and damned if I don't.
 * Anyway, I didn't say it as an accusation. The scenario in my head was that my remark would be read by someone who agrees with me on the evil nature of sexism but to whom the sexist overtone of this particular disambiguator hadn't crossed his/her mind; and this person would say, at least to him/herself, "Whoops! My bad. I should have thought of that. I'm glad he pointed that it." I'm sorry if it came across as hostile. I didn't intend it too. Largoplazo (talk) 23:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your work!
I've just edited a few articles that you recently created, and I wanted to say thank you for adding new articles about women! I've mostly made somewhat minor copy-editing/formatting changes, but feel free to let me know if you have questions about why I made any of the edits that I did. Thanks again! Jmertel23 (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your help! I'm trying to contribute to the Women In Red Wikipedia group by creating articles for forgotten women in science, and I'm running small Edit-a-thons to encourage more women to edit Wikipedia. I'm still learning, so thank you for your kind comments and help Geneticcuckoo (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Medical Society of the District of Columbia) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Medical Society of the District of Columbia.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 23:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)

Ways to improve Harriet Rice
Hello, Geneticcuckoo,

Thanks for creating Harriet Rice! I edit here too, under the username Citrivescence and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Citrivescence (talk) 22:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red
Hi there, Geneticcuckoo, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have you as an "official" member as I can see you have created many informative biographies of women over the years. Keep up the good work.--Ipigott (talk) 08:16, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:40, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

"Harriet Jemima Winifred Clisby (Q24242263)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harriet Jemima Winifred Clisby (Q24242263). Since you had some involvement with the Harriet Jemima Winifred Clisby (Q24242263) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 03:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June 2020
Your addition to Ethel Osborne has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:39, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Lynda Marie Jordan
Hello, Geneticcuckoo,

Thank you for creating Lynda Marie Jordan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Hopefully there are more independent sources that write about the person or her work."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:38, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

August Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2022 with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

May Women in Red events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging