User talk:GeorgeKelsey

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Al Lutz. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. 151.151.73.171 (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I have info about how Doritos concept AND NAME really originated. (Hint: my uncles last name is Dority). I don’t know if anyone cares, but it’s interesting how these stories get told. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:2648:2C78:1C5:2354:39E:8BCD (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

MedCab Case
Regarding this MedCab case i suggest you request a third opinion or a reuest for commentfirst. Hope you have some luck solving this dispute. Seddon69 (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Al Lutz. Wordstock (talk) 13:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Al Lutz
I tried to help with the Al Lutz disagreement by leaving a third opinion, but a third opinion is just that and nothing more. If the opinion does not help you reach consensus mediation is your next step and I see that you have initiated that process.

The purpose of mediation is to work toward a consensus among the editors of an article. If you really believe that your section should be included you will need to make your case and work towards a consensus. If consensus cannot be reached, you could consider arbitration, but arbitration won't be considered unless you make a real effort to reach a consensus.

The reason I tell you this is that I think you need to understand that constantly reverting an article without making the effort to support your case is not serving your cause. If you think your section belongs in the article, then you must actively push for a consensus. At this point, your earlier request has been closed and the information archived, so you will have to go to Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2008-04-01_Al_Lutz and finish filling out the new request if you want your case to move forward. Feel free to use the wording from your earlier request at Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2008-03-20_Al_Lutz. Good luck. Mmyotis (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Disneyland. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ''Both of you need to stop reverting each other's work and go to the talk page. I know there are issues with this date, but reverting constantly isn't going to solve it. --''  McDoob AU  93  02:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)