User talk:GeorgeMoney

RETIRED

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GeorgeMoney/hidden
In a July/August 2010 policy discussion (at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not/Archive 34), community consensus was that the policy What Wikipedia is not does prohibit secret pages. The deletion of this page is not a reflection on you; instead, it is a reflection of the changing community consensus that secret pages set an inappropriate ethos at Wikipedia. In that policy discussion, I wrote here about why all secret pages should be treated equally; whether a user social networks or does not social network on Wikipedia has no bearing on the fact that all secret pages should be deleted. The MfD of User:GeorgeMoney/hidden is at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GeorgeMoney/hidden. Cunard (talk) 08:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:RPOTD/August 16, 2007 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:RPOTD/August 16, 2007. Since you had some involvement with the Template:RPOTD/August 16, 2007 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 03:16, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Template:RPOTD/January 11, 2008 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:RPOTD/January 11, 2008. Since you had some involvement with the Template:RPOTD/January 11, 2008 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 03:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Template:RPOTD/August 13, 2007 listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:RPOTD/August 13, 2007. Since you had some involvement with the Template:RPOTD/August 13, 2007 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 03:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Cat Lovers' Committee/mfd
Cat Lovers' Committee/mfd, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Cat Lovers' Committee/mfd and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Cat Lovers' Committee/mfd during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 01:33, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Resolved2
Template:Resolved2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 01:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Watchlistlink2
Template:Watchlistlink2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

File:PICT0001nathanrdotcom.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PICT0001nathanrdotcom.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted.  S ven M anguard Wha?  18:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Nathansig3.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nathansig3.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:06, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File:ScreenshotJC.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ScreenshotJC.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:GeorgeMoney/sandbox/spotlight/Talk:Poor Richard's Almanac
User:GeorgeMoney/sandbox/spotlight/Talk:Poor Richard's Almanac, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:GeorgeMoney/sandbox/spotlight/Talk:Poor Richard's Almanac and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:GeorgeMoney/sandbox/spotlight/Talk:Poor Richard's Almanac during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Popups7.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Popups7.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Nathansig2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nathansig2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Nathansig1.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nathansig1.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Popups7.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Popups7.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Example-serious.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Example-serious.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Birthday Committee\Bulletin Archive listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Birthday Committee\Bulletin Archive. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:Birthday Committee\Bulletin Archive redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about – most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible – we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Example-serious.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Example-serious.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:11, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sigpollshow
Template:Sigpollshow has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 18:44, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Checkusernotify
Template:Checkusernotify has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:36, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  09:32, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gary Marsh


The article Gary Marsh has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I did not find any non-trivial sourcing to satisfy the biography guideline."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. बिनोद थारू (talk) 03:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)