User talk:Gfyd

Transformers: Age of Extinction
The new character reveals (concerning those of three revealed Dinobots and Galvatron) have already been discussed amongst the page's top editors and they allowed for the information to go up, so could you please stop the disruptive editing? True, that while the toys may not always solidify a character's role in the film itself, Hasbro has confirmed that those Dinobots will appear in the movie to those who attended Toy Fair. Also, the Freightliner Argosy has been confirmed as Galvatron, so there's utterly no reason to delete that. We've seen the characters Strafe and Galvatron in a trailer already. Visit CAJH's talk page if you wish to see where it was discussed. Thank you. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Stop with your edits. Visit the actual site and read the information for yourself. - DecepticonsFTW (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * I would like to second that comment. Removing cited content that is not a copyvio without a justified reason as you did with this edit is considered Disruptive editing so please stop and take part in a discussion on the article talk page. -- MisterShiney    ✉    20:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Imagine Wizard (talk · contribs · [//tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?user=Imagine+Wizard&project=en.wikipedia count]) Iway amway Imagineway Izardway. 21:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Edge
Do you personally have any opposition to my edits which corrected the IP errors? The page is protected due to their disruptive editing so they cannot revert and I anymore. I've spelled out what is explicitly wrong with the additions in an earlier edit summary, I expanded upon this on the talk page for you. If you have no further objections I'll revert back to its original state, where it should be anyway per WP:BRD.LM2000 (talk) 10:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

SPI notice
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Gfyd. Thank you. LM2000 (talk) 17:39, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added the articles that you frequently use IP socks to edit war on to my watchlist and will report any future abuse.LM2000 (talk) 19:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing using several IP sock accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Abecedare (talk) 18:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)