User talk:Gilgamesh4

Welcome!
Hi - thanks for the welcome message - could I ask your advice about something? Yesterday I edited the Barton-on-Sea page with "The village gives its name to the Bartonian age of the Eocene epoch of geological time." This was reverted as 'unsourced content'. I would have thought that the links to other wikipedia pages would count as 'sourced content'? Should I undo the deletion, and if so, what message should I use to explain this to the other editor? (My instinct is to make contact with the other editor but I wanted to clarify the 'wikipedia links' point before doing that) More broadly, is there a resource you could point me to to help with this sort of issue? (I couldn't see anything directly relevant to my question in the links you gave above)

Many thanks

Gilgamesh4 (talk) 9:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

update - I reinstated the text with an added reference - hopefully that will suffice - Gilgamesh4 (talk) 10:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Other Wikipedia articles don't really "count" as a reference. Because the content can be changed by anyone at any time, this can prove problematic, not that circular citations are a good idea in academia, anyways. Use the kind of references talked about here---in this case, perhaps some sort of reliable academic website or article off Wikipedia will do. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  03:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you - My added reference satisfied the other editor to the point where he was prepared to leave the text (but with his added word 'may')

Capitals
Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters ?? What's the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilgamesh4 (talk • contribs) 12:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Sorry. I hadn't read that part of the page.  It seems to have been applied inconsistently (which I now see was what you were trying to correct).  Apologies for my confusion. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


 * No worries - I'd got this wrong with my initial edits, then read MOS:CAPS so made the changes - Wikipedia gets there in the end . . . :-)


 * I hope I've now undone all my erroneous reverts. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of bombings during the Northern Ireland Troubles and peace process, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guildford railway station. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Micro-adventure (disambiguation) has been accepted
 Micro-adventure (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  17:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Micro-adventure_(disambiguation) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.
 * Thankyou :-) - not the most exciting page to create, but housework nonetheless  Gilgamesh4 (talk) 08:08, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, somebody has to keep up the house of Wikipedia. Thanks for helping out, nonetheless. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @  01:20, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Russell McCloud
I have seen some not RS say it is a pseudonym. Also I cannot find the entry for the redirect deletion.Slatersteven (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ballon d'Alsace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belchen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ballon_d%27Alsace check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ballon_d%27Alsace?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

Re archa
Sorry, I was attempting to de-orphan archa (document store), but it's okay that you removed it. Cheers Donama (talk) 07:50, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah - I was just getting the Russian town - It looks like the document store page would be a good 'see also' - Best regards - Gilgamesh4 (talk) 08:06, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 11:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of Cambridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Barnes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arthur der Weduwen has been accepted
 Arthur der Weduwen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Arthur_der_Weduwen help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Yee no  (talk) 🍁 18:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Doctoral students of Emmy Noether has been nominated for deletion
Category:Doctoral students of Emmy Noether has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:David Parr House has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:David Parr House. Thanks! Bkissin (talk) 23:31, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Parr House has been accepted
 David Parr House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=David_Parr_House help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Bkissin (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)