User talk:Ginyild

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

But Worcester Park IS in Surrey
The boundary between London and Surrey runs through Worcester Park, something that is abundantly clear from public documents.. What was your rationale for removing it form Wikiproject Surrey, please? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thankyou for your vigilance. I have been altering many WPSurrey banners (chiefly altering class and importance) in order to help define the scope of Wikiproject Surrey. It is inevitable that in these many edits I will make some decisions that require more thought and discussion, and I hope that you will bear with me. My rationale was based on the article itself, which states that Worcester Park post town does indeed include parts of Surrey but Worcester Park ward is entirely within Greater London. If this is reason to include the article in Wikiprokect Surrey then perhaps we should include Aldershot as well? If, however, the situation is more complicated then it would be very useful to have sources quoted in the article. Ginyild (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The sources for Worcester Park are the boundary maps. I haven't checked whether they are in the article or not, but they are not only meeting WP:RS but also definitive. Worcester Park as an article suffered in the past from almost edit wars over the London/Surrey elements. Pointless, naturally. A substantial part is in the Borough of Epsom and Ewell, demonstrably Surrey. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Surrey
Hi I noticed you have been quite active recently with regards to WP:SURREY, so I would like to enlist your help. I am reactivating the project and have rewritten a number of the pages, and done an overall restyle. I am also looking at defining some general standards for importance, and also general guidelines with regards to what should ideally be present in different types of articles to be located here WikiProject_Surrey/Article_guidelines. I think the guidelines for importance you posted on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Surrey for importance are good, so I will whack these into WP:SURREY/A, and any other input you could give to the project would be fantastic. If you have any questions, reply here, I am watching :) Thanks, GlanisTalk 17:16, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey
Hi,

I've refounded Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey and I saw you were a member of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey. I was wondering, as you are a on the Participants List weather on not you would like to help improve more Surrey articles and make Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey and active Wikiproject again.

I hope you will come and help make Wikipedia: Wikiproject Surrey an active Wikiproject again.

Thanks, pbl1998--Pbl1998 (talk) 14:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

P.S. Either reply or Wikipedia:Wikiproject Surrey on my talk page...

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Javelin dinghy (Europe), Ginyild!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"reviewed already tagged."

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)