User talk:Global Cerebral Ischemia

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  ITAQALLAH  18:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Japanese American internment
Greetings. Your recent edits to Japanese American internment are very interesting, but they are not well documented. Specifically: Can you provide more specific citations? Thanks for your contributions to the article. --ishu 11:21, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The Mueller blog reference needs a specific quotation or blog entry reference. I know that Mueller's blog is riddled with criticism of the internment in general and Malkin in particular.  However for the reference, please add a specific link.
 * "Handful:" We know there were many MAGIC messages.  I have heard assertions both ways ("many" and "only a few"), but I have seen no references either way.

Articles for deletion/Bernice Madigan
Apparently there are several editors who feel that she does not deserve her own article. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 04:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

H+Pedia
Hi there, as a member of Wikiproject transhumanism, I thought you might want to check out the latest on H+Pedia which now has a revamped home page as an introduction point. :) https://hpluspedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Deku-shrub (talk) 21:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Battle of Okinawa
Hello, you just recently reverted my edit about the image description of Richard P. Ross Jr. as Commanding officer of 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines. You had reverted my edit to the previous version, "commanding officer of 1st Battalion, 1st Marines", but in fact he was not commander of 1st Battalion at that time, because commander of 1st Battalion, 1st Marines was Lt.col. Austin C. Shofner at that time. Except the original BIO provided by USMC Military History division you can check this:

http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/USMC/USMC-M-Okinawa/USMC-M-Okinawa-III.html

The image description in the publication The Final Campaign: Marine Victory on Okinawa is not correct. AntonyZ (talk) 15:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * "In April 1945, Ross took part in the battle of Okinawa and because of the course of the battle, he held temporary command of 1st Battalion, 1st Marines for two days after its commander has been wounded in action" from Richard P. Ross Jr. via The Final Campaign: Marine Victory on Okinawa; likely accounts for the apparent discrepancy. This document mentions that he was commander of 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines (see page 21) *and* commander of 1st Battalion, 1st Marines (see caption for cover). It's conceivable that he *was* indeed acting commander of 1st Battalion, 1st Marines when the photo was taken. I still see no reason to doubt the original caption because there is no other source for an alternative caption; see WP:OR. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 17:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * But the Shuri Castle, Okinawa (where the picture was taken) was attacked by Marine Forces on May 21st and the battle lasted for several days or weeks. Lieutenant colonel Ross raised the U.S. flag on the last day of May 1945 (when the photo was taken); he served as acting commander of 1st Battalion, 1st Marines just for two days (May 10-12). So that means, there is a conflict in dates and that means, he aldready served as Commanding officer of 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines at the time of the photo. There is also another evidence for my claim (search: Richard P. Ross Jr. or see page 41 - "Lieutenant Colonel Richard P. Ross, commanding the 3d Battalion, 1st Marines, raised this flag in the rain on the last day of May, then took cover.":

https://www.marines.mil/Portals/59/Publications/The%20Final%20Campaign%20Marines%20in%20the%20Victory%20of%20Okinawa%20%20PCN%2019000313500_2.pdf

Let me know please, I will intend the the change of the caption of the image on the page Battle of Okinawa, but I want the complete agreement before the change. Thank you so much. AntonyZ (talk) 17:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. The evidence you've provided seems to definitively settle the matter. Thanks for looking into this! Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 18:40, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you so much for the Civility Barnstar! I really apprecite it! AntonyZ (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Thank you showing me it was wrong
I Put it back to the way you had it thank you for showing me why it was wrongJack90s15 (talk) 23:07, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: TonyBallioni (talk) 04:21, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Your edit at Talk:Prehistory removed an earlier response to the edit request turning it down
That's something you should never do. I"m unhappy that someone who is a pending changes reviewer would think this ok to do. Doug Weller  talk 17:35, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm not aware of doing this. Can you provide a link showing the changes you allege? Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 22:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * An accident then I guess. where you removed the reply by Deacon Vorbis. Doug Weller  talk 15:04, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hmm I'm honestly not sure how this happened. Maybe a quick cellphone edit where I failed to see what was going on... Thanks for letting me know! Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 17:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

American politics discretionary sanctions notice
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Important notice regarding Coronavirus disease 2019
~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:53, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Content dispute at Coronavirus disease 2019
Hi ,

the page Coronavirus disease 2019 has been protected to prevent further edit warring on a semi-protected page, between users whose experience should be high enough not to engage in such behavior. Please be more careful when the protection expires.

Thanks and best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Use of word Negro
Hey, I want to let you know, I think we need to find a community consensus on when the word Negro should and should not be used. I think it's whitewashing to remove it from many older articles, and indeed it's embedded in the names of many articles, especially schools, also "colored schools". It would not be appropriate to use today, but when we're talking about history, like in Uncle Remus, we're talking about how inappropriate it was. The use of the original wording, in my opinion, is important. Obviously others disagree. I'm searching for a community-wide discussion on when to use such a word, and when not to. I would welcome your help. If we can't find such a discussion, we should start one, I'm not sure the appropriate location (perhaps the Teahouse?). If you can find a discussion, please let me know. I expect it may take some time. I'm extremely busy right now, but maybe ask around. Some of the more prolific editors probably know where exactly to look. Thanks! Jacona (talk) 13:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Updated discussion on SARS-CoV-2 lab leak conspiracy theory
I invite you to take a look and hopefully participate in a renewed discussion about the SARS-CoV-2 lab leak theory, in this link. Forich (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Vox update on fact-check piece
Just wanted to bring to your attention that Vox, the source you used to backup on the question of the origin of SARS-CoV-2 has issued an editor's note, saying: .Forich (talk) 16:16, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for bringing this to my attention. The apparent certitude of commentary on this topic a year ago was deeply misleading, and my own comment unintentionally contributed to that. Sadly, I suspect that this was at least partially driven by politics. I've long since changed my mind, and I believe that a possible lab leak is a very real possibility. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Recommendation for "Who Wrote That"
I didn't want to introduce a tangent in your discussion on Talk:Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire, but I wanted to make you aware of the Who Wrote That? browser extension. It adds a menu item to the left sidebar on articles. When you click it, you can hover over any prose content in the article and immediately see when it was added to the article and who added it. It makes it easy to figure out whether a problem in an article was just recently added or has been in the article for awhile. It also highlights all of the other text added by that editor. Cheers! Schazjmd  (talk)  15:14, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot, really appreciate it! Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 15:53, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Persecution of pagans in the late Roman Empire


Though your report at AN3 was closed as no violation there may still be a long term edit war on the article. Consider opening up an WP:Request for comment on the article talk page. This would require you to state tersely what the dispute is about, and it might bring it outside editors to give their opinions. Other options are given at WP:Dispute resolution. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will definitely consider that. The dispute has been ongoing for sometime, so I think that may be helpful. Global Cerebral Ischemia (talk) 15:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Notice
Alexbrn (talk) 17:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)