User talk:Gluonman

Welcome!

 * }

September 2011
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Antoine Dodson. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use thesandbox. Thank you. ''Do not intentionally misquote articles just because you have an WP:OPINION. WP is not the place to express them.'' Srobak (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Beats by Dr. Dre, you may be blocked from editing. Srobak (talk) 13:11, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Genecia Luo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Genecia Luo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Genecia Luo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Genecia Luo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Genecia Luo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Genecia Luo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ww2censor (talk) 04:14, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:LeeHsienLoongSpeaking.png
Thank you for uploading File:LeeHsienLoongSpeaking.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Zhanzhao (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Lee Hsien Loong
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Lee Hsien Loong page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick {c} 11:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Koh Poh Koon, you may be blocked from editing. Arctic  Kangaroo  10:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Andy Ong, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop removing referenced content, that cannot be considered spam either. Arctic   Kangaroo  15:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Good-faith or bad-faith?
Hey Gluonman, I have been observing you. I notice that some of your edits are fine while some are vandalism, factual errors etc. So, could you give me an honest answer here, whether you are editing in good-faith or bad-faith? Arctic  Kangaroo  11:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Hey there, sorry if I may have been a little rude in the above message. :( Arctic   Kangaroo  15:57, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Li Jiawei. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Arctic Kangaroo (  ✉  •  ✎  ) 14:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Southeast Asian haze, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gleneagles Hospital and Medical Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 02:27, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to User:Seedfeeder— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 03:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Use of triple parentheses
Please don't tag names with triple parentheses like you did in this edit. — Strongjam (talk) 13:49, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cathy Young. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Granger (talk · contribs) 13:40, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits
Please note that edits such as these will not be tolerated on Wikipedia. I see from your talk page that you have made similar edits before. If you persist, I won't hesitate to report your antics to the higher ups.-- Gen. Quon   (Talk)   13:28, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

May 2020
Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:32, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

October 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Hedge fund, you may be blocked from editing. Yuorvee (talk) 06:06, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Kindly explain why you think my edit of hedge funds counts as vandalism. Gluonman (talk) 07:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Singapore is a known offshore financial centre (OFC), as specified by the International Monetary Fund (source: https://www.imf.org/external/np/mae/oshore/2000/eng/back.htm#table1). What is your agenda in removing Singapore from the list here? I am reverting the change. Kindly justify your viewpoint before attempting another edit. Gluonman (talk) 07:07, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Also kindly justify why PricewaterhouseCoopers is regarded as an "unreliable source". Thanks. Gluonman (talk) 07:10, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

FYI this was a long term troll, see SPI/LTA. CMD (talk) 14:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Not a sockpuppet Gluonman (talk) 16:45, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2024
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Dawkin Verbier (talk) 14:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Explain. Lee Hsien Loong's home address is widely known on the Internet. Roy Ngerng has posted Lee's affidavit on his (Roy's) blog which clearly shows Lee's home address - no request has been made to take the affidavit down. Gluonman (talk) 15:15, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anglo-Chinese School (International) Singapore


A tag has been placed on Anglo-Chinese School (International) Singapore, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)