User talk:GoldRenet

Mac OS X Tiger
Thanks for the helpful advice. - Wingedbunny (User talk:Wingedbunny1) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingedbunny1 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Ref removal on Apple Inc.
The link worked, it just wasn't formatted properly in the ref template. RN 08:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   13:00, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

-- HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   14:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Communism
No, you are right. I stand corrected. Thanks for pointing out my error. B. Fairbairn (talk) 12:39, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Flemish Community
Hi, I just wanted to say that you are right. I was thinking about the territory it covers, which includes Brussels, but indeed the majority is in the French Community. Stupid mistake. SPQRobin (talk) 12:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you. Sorry if I seemed harsh in reverting your edit. Gold  Renet  13:07, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit of Gotye
From belgian citizenship laws: "A person at least 18 years old who voluntarily obtained another nationality before 9 June 2007 automatically lost their Belgian nationality." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.168.129 (talk) 07:19, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * That may be true, but as I understand from all sources I read, Wouter De Backer moved with his parents to Australia on a young age (as a child), and not as an adult of more than 18 years old.


 * See:, (you can translate the sites with Google Translate if necessary) and see the Wikipedia article itself (which may be a bad source in itself, but I display it here anyway): "Born in Belgium in 1980, De Backer moved to Australia with his family at a young age. His parents chose to use the English variation of his name, Walter, when enrolling him in school. From early on, De Backer displayed a passion for music, learning various instruments, piano and drums most notably. In his teens, De Backer formed the band Downstares with three of his high school friends, including Lucas Taranto who still plays in his Gotye live shows today. Downstares played shows mainly in the North-Eastern suburbs of Melbourne and were noted for their song-writing maturity and assured live performances."
 * And every source I read thus far says the same. They all don't portray the idea that Wouter has moved to Australia when he was 18 or older. Gold  Renet  08:31, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

From the Belgium foreign affair website "2. You will automatically lose your Belgian nationality on your 28th birthday if: Between the ages of 18 and 28, your main place of residence was not in Belgium."

Regardless of my first finding, Gotye would have lost his citizenship for this reason as well. Gotye is 31, so past the age of 28...and his main place of residence during his years from age 18 to 28 were in Melbourne, Australia...not Belgium. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.168.129 (talk) 13:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Wouter De Backer does not fulfill the requirements of that section as the provisions there are cumulative:

2. You will automatically lose your Belgian nationality on your 28th birthday if:

You were born abroad after 1 January 1967.

AND

Between the ages of 18 and 28, your main place of residence was not in Belgium.

AND

You have not been working abroad for the Belgian Government or a company or association established under Belgian law.

AND

You have not made a "déclaration de conservation/behoudsverklaring" of Belgian nationality (declaration stating your intention to retain Belgian nationality) between the ages of 18 and 28. The declaration is made at the Belgian embassy or consular mission.

AND

You hold one or more other nationalities.

AND

You did not voluntarily acquire the Belgian nationality after your 18th birthday.
 * For example, the single fact that he does not fulfill the first provision of the section, more specifically that he is born in Belgium and not abroad, makes that he does not fall under the section and doesn't lose his Belgian citizenship. Gold  Renet  14:10, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Alright, going by Belgian nationality law, I do believe it's very likely that this person no longer has the Belgian nationality. It says, "A person at least 18 years old who voluntarily obtained another nationality before 9 June 2007 automatically lost their Belgian nationality." and "A child under 18 will lose Belgian citizenship if a responsible parent loses Belgian citizenship." That means that if his parents acquired the Australian nationality after their move (which is more than likely since he himself has done so), then he automatically lost his Belgian nationality. So I really think his supposed Belgian nationality needs a source; the fact that he was born there is not sufficient proof. Prayer for the wild at heart (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for responding, I will look into it it one of these days. Gold  Renet  06:52, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * I found the time to look into it and I agree it needs a source. By looking at the rules at the Belgian foreign affairs website there is no certainty that Gotye would have retained his Belgian citizenship. Well, that is according to present Belgian nationality legislation. I know the law changed in 1985, but I don't know what the rules were before and whether Gotye moved to Australia before or after the law came into force. If lost, he may also have re-aquisited Belgian nationality.
 * That aside, and by coincidence or not, Gotye came on the Belgian radio station "Studio Brussel" today on the occasion of the concert he will give in Brussels on October 30, and that same question our discussion is about, came up. The interviewer asked whether he was Belgian or Australian as (and I loosely cite) "both countries talk of Gotye as 'our' Gotye". Gotye then said that he was 'technically' both Belgian and Australian.
 * Unfortunately, the radio interview is (and probably always will be) unsourcable, unless some news paper makes an article about it, which I doubt.
 * This all taken together is why I agree it needs a source. Gold  Renet  16:37, 21 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Good find! The radio show can be used as a source like this: . Cheers, Prayer for the wild at heart (talk) 08:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC).


 * Ok, thanks! I didn't realise they put the interview online :p BTW, the interview was because of his concert in Club 69 on November 3 apparently, and not the one in the AB. Gold  Renet  08:37, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)