User talk:GonzagaFoodie509~2019

Tone - Seems to be unbiased and neutral. There isn't someone's opinion tied to the article. Although some content may be offensive towards the reader there does not seem to be a personal biased included as part of the article content. No viewpoints are over presented or under presented. However, because the article is talking about a song from an album of the artist Eminem then some of the content could be subjective. The article is written from a standpoint of explanation of the song 97 Bonnie & Clyde. GonzagaFoodie509~2019 (talk) 19:20, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, GonzagaFoodie509~2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:18, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Response
Hi! At this point the only thing you would do would be to add a citation to an article, although if you want to just practice in your sandbox, this may be fine as well.

I actually have something that you can do, if you like: the article for BoyBand (film) needs to have a film review added to the article. This site has reviewed the film and would be considered a reliable source, so you can add this to the article as a source. You can also add a sentence to the article that quotes the review. Here's actually a sentence you can add:


 * Film Threat reviewed BoyBand, writing that "The problem entirely lies in a story, so wacky you can’t relate to it and jokes that have no payoff. Boy Band is a wasted opportunity."

You would of course add the citation to the end of the sentence. This training module will go over adding a citation to an article, if you haven't taken it already. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 23:55, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello! I made the suggested edits but it looks like my edit was undone. Any pointers on how to ensure that my changes stick next time or was this more of a test? Thanks in advance!

GonzagaFoodie509~2019 (talk) 06:06, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to BoyBand (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: BoyBand (film) was changed by GonzagaFoodie509~2019 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2019-06-18T05:53:15+00:00

Additional Question Regarding Assignment
Hello Shalor, I just wanted to follow-up on my question from Monday. I tried to add the citation that you recommended but I wasn't successful. I got an automated message indicating that my change was not going to be published. Anything that you think I can do better next time to ensure that the change actually takes place? In addition, just wanted to check in, I did a peer-review on the article that I assigned to myself this week. Should I be doing a peer-review to other class mates and their assigned articles? I guess I just want to make sure that I am doing what I need to in order to prep me for the final assignment. What does the final assignment/deliverable look like? Are there any examples that you can point me to? Thanks in advance. GonzagaFoodie509~2019 (talk) 23:28, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * (I'm not Shalor, but I thought I might offer a brief note.) Regarding the automated message, it looks you were caught by a ClueBot NG false positive. Fortunately, it appears you were able to successfully add it in the end. Retro  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 14:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Thanks ! I think it was the quote, so this was just a false positive. I'm glad that it was able to get worked out.
 * With peer reviews you should select one of your classmates and review their draft via the peer review process. You don't have to review all of them - it looks like you only have to do one. (Some classes do two, but since there's no specific number I'm going to assume that it's just one you have to do.) This classmate has some work in their userspace that you can review, if you like. That said, I do think that it's a good idea to review your own contribution since it's a good way to catch anything that you may have missed like typos and the like. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)