User talk:Grand Slam 7

Thank you
Thank you for your suport in my RfA. In a few months after I graduate I think I'll be able to come back and try again later. I'll be sure to be involved in MfD, AfD. Do you have any tips or suggestions for me based on what you remember? From your talk page, it looks like you are a new member. If you need any help just ask! X ['Mac Davis '] (SUPERDESK |Help me improve ) 06:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Possible deletion of Arriva Northumbria
Thanks for removing the tag. P.S. The taking offense bit was only a bit of anger at the time! I hope you didn't take any offense! Sorry,

Once again, Thank you!

Arriva436 14:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

TV9
You (quite rightly) added a db-nocontext to TV9. I'd been reading about Indian TV News channels earlier today, so I thought I recognised it. I detagged it and expanded it a bit. It's still not very good, but I don't think it's a speedy deletion candidate any more. Cheers ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Redwall series
This is a speedy page, not a redirect. Please leave it as it is.--Anthony.bradbury 21:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Any page which is a gratuitous insult is a speedy by definition.--Anthony.bradbury 21:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Page is now correct, and correctly redirected. A vandal had added the insult and removed the redirect. You were right - I was wrong. My apologies.--Anthony.bradbury 21:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Limelight Networks
I made several changes to Limelight Networks, and I think the article should be okay now, with notability adequately established. --Eastmain 02:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Newyorkbrad's RfA
Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, and for your kind comment accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 18:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/Free Republic
Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 20:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Bearian's RfA
Thank you for supporting my RfA, which passed 63 to 1. I hope that I'm doing a good job so far. Bearian 20:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camp Pathfinder


The article Camp Pathfinder has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Camp Pathfinder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Pathfinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Camp Pathfinder & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Camp Pathfinder for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Pathfinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Camp Pathfinder & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)