User talk:GreenLoeb

Important Notice
—— Serial # 17:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Ezra Pound Infobox
Hi, I noticed that you added an infobox to the Ezra Pound article that was immediately deleted – there are a number of editors who are adamantly opposed to an infobox in the Ezra Pound article – there have been discussions about it on the Talk page (you can look up the history there and see the reasons for not having an infobox) – personally, I am in favor of an infobox, but there are editors who will not allow it in any form – I am informing you in case you were wondering why your edit was reverted so quickly without explanation – cheers – Epinoia (talk) 19:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Resource request
Hello! I noticed that you are part of Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: University of Alabama in Huntsville, and I was hoping you could help me out. I am trying to get some information from an ebook (International Directory of Company Histories. Volume 214) that is available from the University of Alabama - Huntsville Louis Salmon Library. The book contains a section on Cloud9 Esports, Inc, which is what I am after. It appears that this is precisely what I am looking for. If you could help me out, I would greatly appreciate it. Pbrks (talk) 16:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

edit
Hey, Can you help make the contribution better, I see that you are just deleting it--there are serious notable source to back this info up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcalavitta (talk • contribs) 03:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Hey,

I'm a little confused about calling contributions irreverent when they use major news sources like Rolling Stone to prove they are a fact--Wiki itself says that notable facts are from notable sources, and Rollin Stone and Slate are notable sources, yes? Also, question: are you saying racism and such are opinions, when there is lots of research that this is a fact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcalavitta (talk • contribs) 23:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)