User talk:Gruebleener

Welcome!
Hello, Gruebleener, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sandtalon (talk) 09:05, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hi Gruebleener! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Moe (slang) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Though I also need to say this....sorry! Sandtalon (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the information! I'll be careful from now on. Gruebleener (talk) 07:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hi Gruebleener! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Fictosexuality several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Anarchyte ( talk ) 07:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Human-oriented sexualism


The article Human-oriented sexualism has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "COATRACK for fictosexuality"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★Trekker (talk) 03:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Human-oriented sexualism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Human-oriented sexualism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Human-oriented sexualism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ★Trekker (talk) 17:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)