User talk:Guillermo Sanders

November 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at SAT. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''There is no evidence that that pdf underwent peer review and was published in a reputable journal. Stating otherwise is false.'' Drmies (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * There is no such Wikipedia peer review requirement. And it was obviously peer reviewed by at least ERIC if not others as well. Making stuff up won't help you.  Do not post fake stuff and fake threats on my talk page.--Guillermo Sanders (talk) 05:02, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Bon courage (talk) 06:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)