User talk:Gwytherinn

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome, and thanks for joining the Women's History project. - PKM (talk) 03:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Replying on my Talk page is perfectly correct! If you have any other questions, feel free to ask me. - PKM (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much PKM! Do you get an indication as to whether I reply here if this page isn't on your watchlist? Gwytherinn (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Only if it's on my watchlist. Which it is. - PKM (talk) 02:10, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Women's History
WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 11:16, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you!! Gwytherinn (talk) 14:56, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! and some suggested entries
Thanks for your recent work on entries related to women's history. I'm glad you're participating in WikiProject Women's History. If you have any questions, concerns, or bright ideas about the project, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page.

Based on your recent edits, perhaps you'd be interested in expanding the entries on Julia Lathrop, maternalist reform, Josephine Goldmark, or United States Children's Bureau (all of which I've recently added cleanup tags to). Lots of the reformers affiliated with Hull House also need their entries marked with cleanup tags and/or expanded.

I've also been toying with starting a task force on Law and Policy in United States Women's History. Does this sound like something you'd be interested in helping with? ---Shane Landrum (cliotropic &#124; talk &#124; contribs) 00:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Shane, thank you very much for your suggestions about where I might be able to help. I would very much like to help with the topic on Law and Policy in US Women's History, and I'll check out the individual pages you pointed out. I am also particularly interested in women's roles in supporting war efforts though it is something I am only just beginning to read about in my spare time. Gwytherinn (talk) 00:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Members' input needed at WikiProject Women's History
Hello. I'm writing to you as your name is listed on the members page for WikiProject Women's History. In recent discussions at the project, most notably here, several members have indicated that the scope of the project may need to be more clearly defined and communicated. I have set up a workshop page for this, but it obviously needs as wide a participation as possible to achieve genuine consensus and to allow the project to move forward. You'll find the workshop here.

If you no longer consider yourself an active member of the project, it would help if you could indicate this on the members' page. This will allow us to better gauge how much people-power we actually have. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

African-American Women Suffrage Movement Page
Hi Gwytherinn, I was actually looking at this Wiki page and had some ideas for contributions. Considering the fact that you seem to be the primary contributer to the page, I was hoping we could discuss some of the possible ideas I had for it. I have listed some initial ideas in the discussion section of the page itself.

Thanks!U21980 (talk) 01:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi U21980, I appreciate you taking the time to post on my talk page and would love to discuss ideas about this. I think it's important that the quality be improved and that it gets integrated with the other suffrage information. I just finished my semester so I will have more time now. Gwytherinn (talk) 18:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Women's History Project – Final call for comments on the Scope draft
Our workshop on revising and clarifying the scope of our project has produced a draft outlining our project's scope and criteria for article inclusion. Please join us at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History/Scope workshop to discuss this document. There's a separate section beneath it for final comments, which will remain open through Tuesday, June 14th. As Cynwolfe says "with good participation, we should be able to revise our project page soon, clearing up the issues we've been dealing with and preparing us to go on to the fun stuff." Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Come hang out with us!
Hi! I just wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for "countering systemic bias one new editor at a time", aka closing the gender gap! Come hang out at #wikimedia-gendergap. I hope you'll join us! (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 00:17, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Survey
Hi Gwytherinn!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 04:09, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 16:48, 15 December 2021 (UTC)