User talk:HPLeu

Bathers by a River
Hi, you recently added a URL to this article containing the string. This is a Unix time code that corresponds to May 25, 16:21 GMT (per here). meaning the URL stops working after that date/time - it expires rapidly on purpose. Since you posted the URL to Wikipedia after 16:21 GMT, it is a "stillborn" URL, it never worked. Normally we have processes that look for these a and can save them at Wayback before they die. If you would like to regenerate the URL with a new timecode, and post it immediately to the article, a Wayback URL should get created, which you can then add to the citation with archive-url by finding it at archive.org within a hour or two. -- Green  C  21:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

""Amanda Cassatt"" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect &. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:07, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mayday Health


A tag has been placed on Mayday Health, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Reply
There are some major problems with your Mayday Health article.

First, note that if you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:HPLeu. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   . If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Also read the following regarding writing an article:


 * you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * I checked several of your refs. Those I read all appeared to be press releases with quotes from Mayday or interviews with its representatives, rather than independent third-party sources


 * The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
 * significant coverage in
 * independent,
 * multiple,
 * reliable,
 * secondary sources.
 * Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.
 * Why is this organisation notable? It's only a few months old, and you give us no facts about it. Your text doesn't tell us how many staff or members it has, or anything about its income or expenditure.


 * You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews. Your text is entirely "This is what we do" with no real facts and dubious sourcing.
 * There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
 * You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

A minor point: "See also" should not include items like Roe v Wade that are already linked in the text.

Please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Once you have done so, and responded to the COI request above, if you still wish to proceed I'll restore as a draft. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:54, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amanda Cassatt


A tag has been placed on Amanda Cassatt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. UKWikiGuy (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Self-portrait in a velvet dress
Hiya. Thanks for the new article! I was pretty surprised to see it hadn't been created before when I reviewed it - and what a pity the painting's not been uploaded to Commons! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I was also surprised it hadn't been created. Thank you for reviewing. I will look into a way to get the painting uploaded. HPLeu (talk) 20:15, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, HPLeu. Thank you for your work on Michael Ketchmark. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:23, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

File:Edward policy 2023.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Edward policy 2023.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk)  @ 21:21, 12 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I was late to review this, but after reading the discussion it looks like uploading this file was an error and deleting was the correct step. For sure a learning experience for me. HPLeu (talk) 01:54, 20 March 2024 (UTC)