User talk:Habatchii

Message Answering Placement
Please leave all messages here according to their respective topic(s).

TransWiki Messages
Aloha Habatchii, thanks for being willing to help out! If you haven't already done so, all you have to do to get started with translating is apply to be a translator here. Then you can translate at this page. Basically, all you have to do is click on one of the categories and then choose messages to translate.

Right now, the priority is to get all of the messages in the "most used" category translated. Please have a look at some lists of already-translated messages to see how some of the messages have been translated. Also, when typing diacritics, please try to use the proper ʻokina (ʻ) instead of apostrophes (') and the proper kahakō instead of alternatives like diereses (ö). If you have a Mac, use the Hawaiian keyboard layout when translating. Mahalo! &mdash;Kal (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Wisconsin Legislature
May I ask why you added coord missing templates on Wisconsin Legislature? The article is not a body of people, not about a building. For that see Wisconsin State Capitol. (I apologize for not leaving this message under one of your categories; I could not figure out where it belonged.) Cheers --BaronLarf 21:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/False Production concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/False Production, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/False Production concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/False Production, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/False Production


Hello Habatchii. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "False Production".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 02:03, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: False Production (February 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:False Production and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Habatchii Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tokyogirl79&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Habatchii reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of .codes


The article .codes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * NN new TLD spam

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Be..anyone (talk) 11:33, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of .codes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .codes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/.codes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kolbasz (talk) 21:41, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Edit Warring Noticeboard
Hi Habatchii. I notice that you recently made a report at the edit warring noticeboard. This noticeboard is to report editors who are disrupting Wikipedia by repeatedly reverting others' edits on a particular article or who have violated the three-revert rule. It is not the place to report editors who you feel have done something in retaliation to you. When you make a report to the edit warring noticeboard, please make sure that the editor you are reporting is actually edit warring and that you have evidence of this, otherwise your report will be rejected out of hand. If you are genuinely concerned about the conduct of an editor (that is, if you think someone is harassing you or editing disruptively in an attempt to retaliate towards you) please raise it at WP:ANI. Remember that any report you make must be based on substantive evidence; bare accusations against other editors will not be looked upon kindly. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask me. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 23:29, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your speedy response.

The editor currently known as AndyTheGrump is indeed conducting a massive edit war; proof of which can be isolated and documented; it can be reproduced. The user is also being accused of sockpuppetry, hosting more than one account for the purpose of overly inflating their prescence. I have no intent of arguing further with this user, they have a history of making edit 'enemies' and I do not believe it to be professional to associate with such activity. Should the user which to discuss civilly the issues of their argument, then a fair hearing should be established to clear their name and reputation.

The page that started the warring is the Talk:Electronic harassment page; their was a nomination for good article posted with a few suggestions. It developed into a personal rant, gouging at another article page; .codes which was still waiting review before the incident. Again, I do not believe authors should be stalked because they use Wikipedia. The behavior that the user in question has illustrated is very questionable as to their intent.

Please notify the author that no further correspondence from them will be tolerated and official action will be suggested should it continue.

Thank you again for responding.

04:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Who is accusing AndyTheGrump of sockpuppetry and where is this accusation? Note that spurious accusations of socking are often considered personal attacks. --Neil N  talk to me 05:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help...

I am apparently being stalked by other Wikipedia editors. They are attempting to delete the page .codes on a unlisted criterion and created a rant against my posts on the Talk:Electronic harassment talk page. Please inquire concerning. I do believe it is a case of harassment.

Habatchii (talk) 06:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Please see Dispute resolution for steps to take on resolving this matter and the various levels of each. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 07:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)


 * You're not being harassed, you're being disagreed with. The harassment appears to be coming from you. Please stop.  Acroterion   (talk)   11:53, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Neil N  talk to me 13:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

This is again forum-shopping and is disruptive. The deletion discussion will decide if the article will be deleted, not a RFC. Continue in this way and you will be blocked. You haven't answered my question about AndyTheGrump and sockpuppetry. Please do so. --Neil N  talk to me 13:10, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. The only 'edits' I have made are on Wikipedia staff created pages, discussion pages and a single article in which I was the sole editor, until a proposal for deletion was made.

The discussion page entries were suggested by other editors via templates. Only inquiries as to the alienated treatment was being discussed, not disruptive editing. But thank you again for visiting my talk page. Please respond if Wikipedia policy dictates. Habatchii (talk) 13:56, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Please answer my question about AndyTheGrump and sockpuppetry. --Neil N  talk to me</i> 14:29, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Transparency dispute concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Transparency dispute, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Transparency dispute


Hello, Habatchii. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Transparency dispute".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:10, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Draft:False Production concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:False Production, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.

Thanks,

Jon Katz

Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation

Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:False Production


Hello, Habatchii. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "False Production".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:49, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!
Hi there! Thanks for joining Wikipedia Asian Month. Here is some information about participating in the event: Best Wishes, --AddisWang (talk) 03:33, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
 * 2) Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
 * 3) Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
 * 4) If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
 * 5) Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for language editions.
 * 6) If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Harold S. Vincent High School
May I ask why you've re nominated this article for good article review? It's not even a start class article. John from Idegon (talk) 16:13, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I noticed a lot of potential in the article that can be enhanced aesthetically. The main objective of writing encyclopedic articles is to compile accurate and verifiable facts. The criterion for GAS (good article standing) is not un-achievable, the original authors would need an opportunity to meet any barriers to entry for GAS.

I would suggest notifying all original authors before proposing not to complete the criterion. Habatchii (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Specifically where is that potential? I find no books written about this school and very little info other than what is normally available for any US school. John from Idegon (talk) 16:54, 30 November 2016 (UTC)


 * I agree with . Based on the criteria for Good Articles WP:GA?, I don't think Harold S. Vincent High School or latin honors were ready to be nominated. Knope7 (talk) 21:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * With all due respects; neither of the articles are ready. But Wikipedia does have a policy of notifying existing authors that their material is being considered for good article WP:GA? status before a full retraction of consensus vote. Perhaps you or a constituent can contact one of the authors and formally begin the nomination/declination process? Habatchii (talk)
 * So let me get this straight. You nominated an article (or was it two?) for GAR, knowing full well they were not ready, and that means that another editor needs to do something? Nominating articles for GAR knowing they are not ready is a bad faith edit. Seriously, I don't think I've ever heard a more bad faith thing here.  Rather than expect other editors to do something, you need to revert your edits nominating the articles involved. I can't speak to the other article, but neither my search (as an experienced school editor), nor the search of a colleague who is quite experienced with Wisconsin, turned up anything to indicate the article could even be raised to C, much less good. John from Idegon (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * There's a lot you could be doing to improve our thousands of articles and stubs, but with only 97 edits to mainspace, it is most unlikely that you even have a close idea of what is involved for GA. It's generally expected that the nominator is the major contributor to an article and will follow the reviewer's recommendations and do the work. Your nominations will not pass, and making such nominations is disruptive and time wasting for all the experienced editors who have to stop and tell you so. Articles nominated for GA must be as ready as possible with need for only tiny improvements of the kind that an experienced reviewer will notice.


 * You haven't bothered to read the instructions and requirements for GA, and apart from the other issues listed by, and by who with me is the other coordinator of WP:WPSCH, you haven't even attempted to take WP:WPSCH/AG into consideration or even look at some school GA examples such as Hanley Castle High School or Malvern College. Please withdraw these nominations otherwise I may have to consider asking you to stop working on school articles altogether and any others you might be disrupting. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)


 * This is a talk page. Your paragraph in defense of Wikipedia is appreciated. Existing authors also have talk pages. It is rare that such exchange will enter 'mainspace'. Concerning the articles, precision writing and volume text file dumping is not rare. People have done it since the dawn of the personal computer with surgeon-like precision. You are asking for corporate grade information. You have just met me on Wikipedia. Certainly they have templates for the GA criterion that anyone can edit. I would be honored to withdraw the nominations. Perhaps you can contact a bot to execute them for me. Habatchii (talk)

Your GA nomination of Harold S. Vincent High School
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Harold S. Vincent High School you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KDTW Flyer -- KDTW Flyer (talk) 15:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Latin honors
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Latin honors you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Harold S. Vincent High School
The article Harold S. Vincent High School you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Harold S. Vincent High School for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of KDTW Flyer -- KDTW Flyer (talk) 19:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Latin honors
The article Latin honors you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Latin honors for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Advanced Space Civilizations (Media)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Advanced Space Civilizations (Media), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Advanced Space Civilizations (Media) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Advanced Space Civilizations (Media) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Advanced Space Civilizations (Media)Userbox
Template:WikiProject Advanced Space Civilizations (Media)Userbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate


Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.

I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!

Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!

If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.

Thank you!

- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team

This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.

Nomination of .codes (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article .codes (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/.codes (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. feminist (talk) 13:05, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Habatchii/List of ambulance companies (by country)


Hello, Habatchii. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of ambulance companies (by country)".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 17:59, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Articles needing audio and or video has been nominated for discussion
Category:Articles needing audio and or video has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 05:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii § Campaign to upload Lāhainā photographs
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Hawaii § Campaign to upload Lāhainā photographs.