User talk:Harp

Hi, welcome to the English Wikipedia. Glad you've decided to do some contributing here, too. Isomorphic 16:35, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Fusion Diagram
I have redrawn my diagram in Inkscape (which is excellent) and uploaded an SVG to the commons. You can find it here: commons:Image:FusionintheSun.svg. However, as you have probably noticed, mediawiki, or imagemagick, has not rendered the end-markers at all. Firefox renders them properly, if you view the SVG directly. I am not sure what is wrong. Maybe you could have a look if you know a bit about SVG? The first, slightly bigger, file that I uploaded is the Inkscape SVG which you might find more useful, The second is the plain SVG. -- Borb 21:36, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Particle physics images
Hi Harp. I was just archiving stuff on my page, and I ran across the old notes you sent on particle physics images that you created, organized, etc. I got them all when I wasn't really doing much on Wikipedia, so I apologize for not replying. Anyway, what you've put together looks good&mdash;if there's still anything I ought to do to help, let me know. -- SCZenz 17:19, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

Sentence at Big Bang article
There is no compelling physical model for the first 10-33 seconds of the universe, before the phase transition called for ??????? by grand unification theory.

Hi. The sentence at Big Bang was complete. "Call for" means "ask for", "indicate to be necessary", etc., and there's no way to put a word into "the phase transition called for __ by grand unification theory" that makes any sense. Any native speaker of English would understand the grammar of the sentence. However, since many non-native speakers read the English Wikipedia, I changed it to something I hope will be a little clearer and better style: "There is no compelling physical model for the first 10-33 seconds of the universe, before the phase transition that grand unification theory calls for." Thanks for bringing this to my attention. &mdash;JerryFriedman 16:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

orbit.svg
Hi, your new figure looks like a significant improvement over the old one. I like it. Put it in, I think! I feel a bit silly suggesting any improvements since it's usually more hard work than it seems, but perhaps the orbit could be outlined with a darker line than the yellow (it'd be useful to have it more prominent than the ecliptic), and the blue arrow for the argument of perihelion could be moved further out from the center so the concentration of arrows there is smaller. Deuar 14:27, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Large Hadron Collider is Science Collaboration of the Week
User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 11:46, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

--- Harp

You left a message on my discussion page (Jz_007) Such are the vagaries of Wikipedia authoring that I've no idea how I should respond and the help section wasn't much help! See more at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jz_007

JZ

My finicky action re attribution of talk
I think you are also (as you in effect claimed) User:193.224.148.63. I restored that IP's sig, and explained in an annotation, at Talk:Edwin Hubble. You may regard my action as overly cautious, but i hope you will communicate with me on this talk page about possibly establishing that you at least have access to the IP address, reinforcing your colleagues' confidence in that claim. (Let's keep our discussion together on this page, but i'm not sure how often you're seeing messages on it, and you should feel free to alert me at my user-talk -- and please alert me, if you see i've made contribs on several different days since a response by you without my answering.) Thanks! --Jerzy•t 06:46, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Color tool
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)