User talk:Hattrem

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -&#8472;yrop (talk) 23:55, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

List of Norwegian Wikipedians
You Wikipedian, you! :-) I took the liberty of adding you to the list of Norwegian Wikipedians. You better not mind. – Pladask 13:07, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Cohen articles
Hi, and thanks for cleaning up some of my typos on the Cohen album articles. I'd like to ask you what you think of merging I'm Your Fan and Tower of Song into Leonard Cohen and the various albums that the tribute songs are from. WP:Album suggests that compilations don't usually deserve an article, and I think that everything that one can say about these two compilations can be fit into the primary articles (some of which are still rather bare-bones). Any thoughts? Jkelly 18:42, 9 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Hello, and thank you for your valuable contributions!
 * I don't really object to your proposition, as the information contained in these two articles could be split between the Cohen page and the original albums – but would like to point out that while I'm Your Fan and Tower of Song are indeed compilations, all the tracks were original recordings (as far as I know). – Hattrem 05:43, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


 * That's true, and there's no reason to be hasty about a merge. We can see what things look like once all the information is in other articles, which it isn't.  On a side note, I don't think it's typical to bold everything in the track list.  Is there some reason to do that?  Jkelly 13:59, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


 * No other reason than that the songs are what the albums are really about. But it's no important thing to me and I won't insist. About a merge, I guess we'll see. As there are over a thousand cover recordings of Cohen songs, we obviously can't list them all in the album articles. I'm Your Fan and Tower of Song may be the most obvious collections to mention, but I'm concerned it might open for all kinds of additions about other cover recordings. – Hattrem 16:12, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Okay, I'm going to go ahead with the un-bolding, for the sake of standardization. I also think that Wp's back-end treats bolded text in a particular way, which may or may not be a good thing.  If it makes the article more prominent in the search list when someone searches for things, I think that there is a good argument for bolding, but that discussion should probably happen at WP:ALBUM.  As for the cover versions situation, as I have been slowly getting the information into the articles, it seems that those covers are now way too dominant for some of the albums.  I think that the thing to do here is for me to hold off on anymore merging, and instead start bulking up the articles with information about the album and the Cohen recordings, which really should be the focus.  In the (very) long-term, I'm thinking that Songs of Leonard Cohen, at least, might make a reasonable FA candidate, as it was a rather significant recording.  With that in mind, I'm going to make an effort to properly reference the expanding I hope to do over the next little while.  I hope that you'll continue to help out! Jkelly 17:18, 10 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I'll continue contributing to the Cohen articles and look forward to seeing them grow. – Hattrem 03:19, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Greetings, fellow Leonard Cohen fan
I have fixed the page history problem involving Famous Blue Raincoat. The old revisions have been restored and moved to the correct title along with the new ones (see history). If you see any more cases where this has happened, please post them at the Cut and paste move repair holding pen or at my talk page. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( [ TALK ] )  15:27, Dec. 20, 2005

Fair use rationale for Image:Edward_Rutherfurd.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Edward_Rutherfurd.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast 18:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Interview with Åse Kleveland
The English Wikinews is going to be organizing an interview with the former Norwegian Culture Minister Åse Kleveland. She was also the head of the Swedish Film Institute and is now the chairwoman of the Norwegian Humanist Association. I am asking Wikipedians from all of the Scandinavian languages to contribute questions to her upcoming interview with Wikinews in Oslo. The page is here; please leave questions there and comments to me either on my en.wikinews talk page or my en.wikipedia talk page. Thank you very much! Mike H. Fierce! 02:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Wiki-event Stiklestad, Norge 27 juli
Hello, I'm posting this to some norwegian wikipedians on en:wp. Please take a look at no: Wikipedia:Wikievent_Stiklestad_juli_2012.

Jeg tror det er første gangen vi i Norge prøver et wiki-event utenfor de store byene. Dette er ikke et kurs i wikipediaskriving, men en mulighet for allerede erfarne skribenter til å få kompetent informasjon om stedet og det de holder på med der. En slags «pressevisning», VIP-pleie eller 1-dags wikipedian-in-residence. Vi har lagt opp et program som jeg tror vil interesse de fleste som er opptatt av norsk historie, kirkehistorie og/eller kulturhistorie. Med vennlig hilsen, --Orland (talk) 09:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Songs from the Road (Leonard Cohen album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sharon Robinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Knick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Andrews. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)