User talk:Headtransplant

Your recent editing history at Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron - Rescue list shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. AndyTheGrump (talk) 02:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. TL22 (talk) 02:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Article Rescue Squadron New article
Template:Article Rescue Squadron New article has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TL2<b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b> (<i style= "color:green">talk</i>) 02:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Stay off my talk page
This is a formal request for you to stop posting on my talk page - any posts other than obligatory notifications will be reported as a violation of talk page guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:18, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * please see: Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring which I obligatory notificatied you about on your talk page.
 * If you continue to be WP:Uncivil, calling me a "troll" and my edits "vandalism", I will also report you. Headtransplant (talk) 04:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Interpretation of Wikipedia policy: If someone tells you to stay off their talk page, and the instructions at a noticeboard say that you are required to post a notice to their talk page, you should stay off their talk page and add a sentence such as "user not notified per request to stay off his talk page" to your report on the noticeboard. If anyone complains about you doing that, send them to my talk page and I will discuss it with them. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Drmies (talk) 04:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Headtransplant, the problem is that your edits on the ARS page and elsewhere are indistinguishable from trolling and, I'm sad to say, not with worth (which is why they were reverted by two editors). Your comment about someone else's supposedly shitty day, that's either a personal attack or trolling--take your pick. Now, stalking is only stalking (by our definition) if it's done to harass a person. If they're looking at your edits, it's probably to see if they make sense. Sure, I could tell Andy that he should have referred to your edits as trolling rather than to the person making them as a troll, but the fact of the matter is that you made some seventy or eighty edits, none of which improved anything at all, and all of which have taken up considerable time and energy, including mine. If seasoned editors tell you you're doing something that's either wrong or useless, it's probably a good idea to listen to them--you may learn something. All the best, Drmies (talk) 05:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Closure of User:JJMC89 reported by User:SuperCarnivore591
RE: Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring

User:Bbb23, reason please.

User:SuperCarnivore591 violated 3RR with five revisions.

Headtransplant (talk) 04:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * User:Bbb23, reason please. Thank you. Headtransplant (talk) 04:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * He reverted your vandalism of the page 5 times, with others doing it additional times.  D r e a m Focus  04:59, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Pretty solid reason, wouldn't you agree, User:Headtransplant? <sub style="color:green;">Fortuna <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  11:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * - Changes without consensus is not vandalism, but rather normal disruptive editing. Both users broke the 3RR, altrough JJMC89 at least stopped after a considerable amount of time. --<b style= "color:red">T</b><b style= "color:#FF4200">L</b><b style= "color:#FF7400">2</b><b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b> (<i style= "color:green">talk</i>) 00:22, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Removing a large chunk of content from a page is vandalism. Reverting vandalism is not edit warring.   D r e a m Focus  02:06, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Removing a large chunk of content from a page ten times in a forty-minute period to be specific. --Guy Macon (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Hypomanic Edge


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Hypomanic Edge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. <b style= "color:red">T</b><b style= "color:#FF4200">L</b><b style= "color:#FF7400">2</b><b style= "color:#FFA700">2</b> (<i style= "color:green">talk</i>) 22:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Congress for Cultural Freedom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Transition. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)